Anti Vaccine psychology

Red Lily wrote:

Sprintcyclist wrote:What about the 95% of Australias who have been fully vaccinated?
We have not all died

.............  there was an overestimation regarding the deadliness of rare causes of death: They thought that uncommon scenarios were way more fatal than they actually were.       ............

Whereas almost 1,000,000 americans have died.

Fully vaxxed Australians are dying or have you missed that?    Aussie has had its highest death tolls since reaching that 95%.

Population of USA 330,000,000.   Population of Australia 25,000,000.   USA has open borders thanks to Biden allowing millions of unvaxxed to roam free and spread.   Australia is an island that has had closed borders for 2 years.

Most people who have died from (not with) Covid have several comorbidities.

Give it up Sprint.  This one eyed comparative obsession between the US and Australia you have going is unrealistic and naive.

.......... Fully vaxxed Australians are dying or have you missed that?    Aussie has had its highest death tolls since reaching that 95%. .....................

That was always going to be the case.
When we had very restricted travel from overseas and low infections here, our covids deaths were very low.
Once we reached full vaccination rates and life continued as normal, covid would spread and deaths would ensue.
At a much lower rate than had we not been fully vaccinated.

We have gone from essentially approx 10 covids deaths to having 50 a day.
We often used to have very few deaths per day in the past.
We followed the scientific recommendations and it saved lives.

you've gone from 10 to 50 covid deaths a day....you have a high vaxx rate in many cases 2 shots and a booster.  It appears you have no ability to read the writing on the wall.

the deaths are increasing from covid or the vaxx and pretty soon you with your 2 shots and booster will be in the unvaxxed category if you aren't already. But hey. you keep taking those clot shots, i'm sure you're making the right decision.

Did anyone read the OP article? I started to c&p part of it, to show how full of bull that nonsense written by a couple of know-nothings is, but nah; that gives it too much credit.

In short, President Trump is an anti-vaxxer conspiracy nut who only started to slow down his anti-vax stance after the election.

Pray tell, who on this planet even HEARD of Covid prior to the election?

fauci did. gates did. Schwab did.

Calypso Jones wrote:fauci did. gates did. Schwab did.  

I thought of that, and was going to write a caveat, as I was more referring to the average Joe. Left it off. Oh well, I rather regretted responding at all.

2cent wrote:Did anyone read the OP article?  I started to c&p part of it, to show how full of bull that nonsense written by a couple of know-nothings is, but nah; that gives it too much credit.

In short, President Trump is an anti-vaxxer conspiracy nut who only started to slow down his anti-vax stance after the election.

Pray tell, who on this planet even HEARD of Covid prior to the election?

I think Trump was and is for the vaccine. He has been vaccinated himself.
He got the vaccine created, tested and produced very quickly. Did he call it project 'warp speed'.
He wanted to get it done that year, everyone said it was impossible, I thought it would be unlikely but he did it.

He gave no support to masks so sort of derailed the whole idea.
had he given support to masks that might well have made a difference.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/covid-booster-effectiveness-wanes-4-months-cdc-says/

2cent wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:fauci did. gates did. Schwab did.  

I thought of that, and was going to write a caveat, as I was more referring to the average Joe.  Left it off.  Oh well, I rather regretted responding at all.

well don't regret it. What you said is true. I just decided to highlight these monsters' actions.

I would like to how the CDC defines "effectiveness". Do they define "effectiveness" as in how many are dying? Do they define "effectiveness" as in how many have side affects? Do they define "effectiveness" as in how many are immune from the virus?

While I'm on the "effectiveness" questions, how does natural immunity to the virus compare with their gene therapy one? How "effective" is the mRna "Vaccine" and what side affects are possible 5 or 10 years from now, oh wait, they don't know!

They change their definitions weekly, sometimes daily. You are now unvaxxed if you have not had your second booster in some places.