Hannity: can't even stand him any longer

sean...you stinkin' little rino deep state suck up.

Calypso Jones wrote:sean...you stinkin' little rino deep state suck up.

LOL. Tell us how you really feel. Really, though, what is this latest all about?

I've never liked Hannity from the start.  He's smug and has always just rubbed me the wrong way. Does that make me a 'liberal?'

Red Lily wrote:I've never liked Hannity from the start.  He's smug and has always just rubbed me the wrong way.  Does that make me a 'liberal?'  

lol Not hardly. Makes you discerning. Neal Boortz always referred to him as "squeaky clean." Doesn't drink, doesn't smoke, doesn't even cuss.
Hard to trust a guy that clean.

Well he is so into Dr. Oz that he did an ugly hit job AGAIN on Kathy Barnett. I tell you. Since rush passed this little weasel thinks he is the epitome of talk radio. The only ONLY reason i listened to him is that he was on after rush and he was Rush super light after rush. ONLY reason.

Here 2.

Sean sean sean. this is not about putting repunks back in power...it is about putting pro freedom, pro-america conservatives IN. positions of POWER.



you aren't the king maker you think you are Sean. Get lost bud.

Calypso Jones wrote:Here 2.

Sean sean sean.  this is not about putting repunks back in power...it is about putting pro freedom, pro-america conservatives IN. positions of POWER.



you aren't the king maker you think you are Sean.    Get lost bud.

Oh my! Sean means to say that Cathy Barnette makes no distinction between Islam and Radical Islam? Hate to break it to you, Sean, but neither do I. And it IS everyone's right to discriminate against Islam. Presidenst Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe would all agree with that.
"LGBTQ people lead with their sexual preferences?" My goodness, how dare Barnette speak the obvious?!

OTOH, she seriously wants to build a statue of Obamy? That needs investigated.
I always forget the source of "Club for Growth." Has negative connotations, IIFC. needs a check-out.
And I'd agree w/Sean that Barnette needs to answer to her military claims, and also those of being connected with a major financial firm, and an adjunct professor of corporate finance, (or whatever it was.)

Thing is, while I agree that those are questions that need answered, Sean Hannity's tone of voice needs a check-up from the neck up. I do hope that he's not still claiming to be "fair and balanced."

SO, OVER this little egotistical creep.


https://jdrucker.com/there-can-be-no-unity-with-sean-hannity-republicans/

For years, I’ve said a RINO was just as bad as a Democrat. In many ways they’re worse because at least you know what you’re fighting with a Democrat. The lines are clear. With RINOs, you never know which side of a fight they’ll be on. I’ve mused about the whiplash induced in many conservatives over the years with people like Lindsey Graham who sometimes make sense and sometimes reveal their NeoCon agenda.

I concluded in my article that unity was possible for one reason and one reason only: I figured a conciliatory tone would allow me to get the message out to supporters of Dr. Mehmet Oz about his leftist and anti-American leanings. It was a “strategic” move and I’ve been very disappointed in myself ever since. That’s not my style. I take pride in shooting straight and aiming true. It didn’t feel natural to accept unity for the sake of strategizing when deep down I have no intention of ever supporting RINOs.


To my readers and listeners, I humbly and wholeheartedly apologize. I deceived myself into thinking I could reconcile with fellow conservatives who were supporting a globalist like Dr. Oz (or WEF-ally David McCormick, for that matter). By deceiving myself, that means I also deceived my readers, and for that I am truly sorry.

In reality, there is no way I could cheer for, support, or accept either Dr. Oz or McCormick in the Senate.  was being delusional.

Sean Hannity and others went completely nuclear on Kathy Bennette in the last week of the race. They spread lies about her in ways that one normally associates with unhinged leftists. If I thought I could reconcile with him, Ric Grenell, or any of the other Dr. Oz shills, I was wrong. Perhaps I never really thought that. Perhaps it was just wishful thinking. Frankly, I’m just not sure anymore. All I know is that I cannot and will not have unity with RINO-supporters.



Kathy Barnette wasn’t a perfect candidate. Some would say she wasn’t even a good candidate. But I supported her because Dr. Oz and McCormick do not hold America First perspectives and are directly affiliated with globalists. I’d rather lose with Barnette than win with a globalist. This is why I am reversing on the notion that reconciliation with RINO-shills is possible.

W

I’m not a fan of purity tests, but I’m a huge fan of discernment. If we stay true to God and follow our nationalistic beliefs through an America First ideology, we can focus on unifying true patriots. It’s not the “big tent” the GOP wants, nor is it the combining-of-forces to beat Democrats that the Republican Establishment has used against us for decades. It means we’ll support the best America First candidates possible. And if there are no good ones, we shouldn’t support anyone. That goes against Republican orthodoxy, but I don’t care. Republican orthodoxy gave us George W. Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney.



That is hopefully the sentiment we will all fall back on after the primary. As Democrats have proven over the past 16 months, they are an existential threat. As much as I oppose RINO globalist Dr. Oz, I’d still rather see him in the Senate than any Democrat. That didn’t used to be the case; a RINO was once just as bad as a Democrat in my book. But today, I may not like most of what Mitt Romney, Lisa Murkowski, or Susan Collins do with their Senate seats, but at least all of them voted against the radical abortion bill last week. With the Senate as tight as it is, all it would have taken is one of them to have allowed abortion up until birth to be codified.

Just because Romney et al occasionally vote the right way on certain issues doesn’t mean we should support them in any way. The Swamp in general and the Republican Establishment in particular have conned many of us into thinking that centrist, milquetoast politicians are better than radical leftists. That’s not necessarily true. On individual votes, it can be beneficial but we cannot and must not base our support on singular votes. The damage done by people like Romney far outweighs their occasional benefits. They lead many Republican voters down the path of thinking bipartisanship and centrism works. Neither do. Perhaps they once did, but that ship sailed long ago if it ever existed at all.

We are deeply divided, which means those who push the GOP to the mushy middle are actually enabling those who turn into leftists based on separate triggering factors. We need to convince as many Americans as possible that a strong, America First ideology works for everyone. That cannot happen if we keep sending the Mitch McConnells and Dr. Oz’s of the world to Capitol Hill.

Does that mean we need to look at “fringe” candidates? In many ways, yes.

I know this article probably doesn’t make sense to everyone. I don’t like writing or doing podcasts as emotional reactions to events, but if I always wait until I’m completely calm and thinking properly, I may never write at all. That’s the state of the nation right now. There seems to be a constant flow of events prompting emotional responses in those of us who pay attention the most.

The bottom line is this: When I thought I could reconcile with those in conservative media who backed RINO globalists, I was wrong. I deluded myself, and my punishment that I’m unfortunately sharing with you is this convoluted article asking for forgiveness. It is what it is. Feel free to lambaste me in the comments because I totally deserve it.

Interesting fella, that JD Rucker. Thanks, CJ. May ALL Conservatives learn to pass up on voting for the lesser of two evils. As sincere Conservatives know, it's still evil.

PARTY LABELS tell us little, these days.

A more pertinent question will be, HOW LONG has that person been Inside-The-Beltway? They lose all perspective. They forget how normal people see things. They forget basic human and economic values.

Goober Graham has more in common with Mad Maxine and Drunken Nan than he does with Red-State voters. KNOW that. Sometimes he makes sense; but when he does, it's purely accidental.

We KNOW what he stands for, now. Money-printing and Endless War.