Will trump be disqualified ?

Sprintcyclist wrote:Because he tried to change the election result by illegal means.

Casey Jones wrote:

Sprintcyclist wrote:Because he tried to change the election result by illegal means.

Did he now.

State what he did.  Specifically.

What he said, what he did, how he did it.

Contesting an election count, is not illegal.  If it were, Her Hillaryness would be in prison right now.

2cent wrote:

Casey Jones wrote:

Sprintcyclist wrote:Because he tried to change the election result by illegal means.

Did he now.

State what he did.  Specifically.

What he said, what he did, how he did it.

Contesting an election count, is not illegal.  If it were, Her Hillaryness would be in prison right now.

As would Al Gore.

Just how does one become "disqualified," in the first place?  What is the criteria?  Who is in charge of this 'disqualifying'?  

Casey Jones wrote:

2cent wrote:

Casey Jones wrote:

Sprintcyclist wrote:Because he tried to change the election result by illegal means.

Did he now.

State what he did.  Specifically.

What he said, what he did, how he did it.

Contesting an election count, is not illegal.  If it were, Her Hillaryness would be in prison right now.

As would Al Gore.

Just how does one become "disqualified," in the first place?  What is the criteria?  Who is in charge of this 'disqualifying'?  

Why, the hysterical talking heads on the idiot box.

Don't be silly.

But more to the point, Baker noted that the peaceful transfer of power was central to the democratic process and had occurred in far more fraught and difficult times in the history of the United States.

“How about Abraham Lincoln?” Baker said, referring to the 1860 election, during which Lincoln was elected with just shy of 40 percent of the popular vote, but 52 percent of the electoral vote, at a time when the country was on the brink of the Civil War.

“There was tremendous concern — because of the fact that our country at that point in time was basically unraveling — that the Electoral College wouldn’t stand up and do what they were supposed to do and vote on behalf of the people who had actually won the presidential election in their state,” Baker said. “And they did — immediately on the day that they were asked to do it.”

“It is appalling and outrageous that anyone would suggest for a minute that if they lose an election they’re not going to leave, period,” Baker continued. “I know that I speak, I assure, for the vast majority of the elected officials in the United States of America when I say that.”

....... “It is appalling and outrageous that anyone would suggest for a minute that if they lose an election they’re not going to leave, period,”

Charlie Baker
............

............ “Fundamental to democracy is the peaceful transition of power; without that, there is Belarus,”

“Any suggestion that a president might not respect this Constitutional guarantee is both unthinkable and unacceptable.”

Utah Sen. Mitt Romney