Corona Virus Patents

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:covid-19 is a novel coronavirus, a novel coronaviras is a new coronavirus that has not been previously identified. The virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not the same as the coronaviruses that commonly circulate among humans and cause mild illness, like the common cold.

That's the liberal narrative anyway. It's interesting that we've supposedly had the cold virus for thousands of years yet, no one applied for a patent. Now that Corona Virus was created, liberals all want a patent for it. You can dismiss it if that's your jam but, I will continue to say it's odd.

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:RV you are like chicken little, an acorn has landed on your head and you think the sky is falling in Laugh out loud!

Right... Nothing to see here folks, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:RV you are like chicken little, an acorn has landed on your head and you think the sky is falling in Laugh out loud!

Right... Nothing to see here folks, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

vege57 wrote:

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:Checked it out, ya jumping the gun RV. covid19 inst the only corona virus in town mate, some are responsible for the common cold

"Common cold" you say? Now why would there be a patent on something that occurs in nature? Apparently you weren't able to understand the writing on the patents.

""Common cold"" Is a common term used to describe any number of sniffles one gets during the colder moths,

This is the patent, just because they use the word coronavirus doesnt make it covid19, at any point do they use they word covid19

A helper cell for producing an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus (or more generally nidovirus) particle cell comprises (a) a nidovirus permissive cell; (b) a nidovirus replicon RNA comprising the nidovirus packaging signal and a heterologous RNA sequence, wherein the replicon RNA further lacks a sequence encoding at least one nidovirus structural protein; and (c) at least one separate helper RNA encoding the at least one structural protein absent from the replicon RNA, the helper RNA(s) lacking the nidovirus packaging signal. The combined expression of the replicon RNA and the helper RNA in the nidovirus permissive cell produces an assembled nidovirus particle which comprises the heterologous RNA sequence, is able to infect a cell, and is unable to complete viral replication in the absence of the helper RNA due to the absence of the structural protein coding sequence in the packaged replicon. Compositions for use in making such helper cells, along with viral particles produced from such cells, compositions of such viral particles, and methods of making and using such viral particles, are also disclosed.

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:Checked it out, ya jumping the gun RV. covid19 inst the only corona virus in town mate, some are responsible for the common cold

"Common cold" you say? Now why would there be a patent on something that occurs in nature? Apparently you weren't able to understand the writing on the patents.

""Common cold"" Is a common term used to describe any number of sniffles one gets during the colder moths,

This is the patent, just because they use the word coronavirus doesnt make it covid19, at any point do they use they word covid19

A helper cell for producing an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus (or more generally nidovirus) particle cell comprises (a) a nidovirus permissive cell; (b) a nidovirus replicon RNA comprising the nidovirus packaging signal and a heterologous RNA sequence, wherein the replicon RNA further lacks a sequence encoding at least one nidovirus structural protein; and (c) at least one separate helper RNA encoding the at least one structural protein absent from the replicon RNA, the helper RNA(s) lacking the nidovirus packaging signal. The combined expression of the replicon RNA and the helper RNA in the nidovirus permissive cell produces an assembled nidovirus particle which comprises the heterologous RNA sequence, is able to infect a cell, and is unable to complete viral replication in the absence of the helper RNA due to the absence of the structural protein coding sequence in the packaged replicon. Compositions for use in making such helper cells, along with viral particles produced from such cells, compositions of such viral particles, and methods of making and using such viral particles, are also disclosed.

f course it wouldn't look right to call it "Covid-19" the patent since it was 2007 so it was just called the Corona virus. They could have called it anything. It came down to money, power and getting President Trump out.

HawkTheSlayer wrote:More interestingly is who holds the patents on the vaccines. :thumbsup2: