The Great Anthony Fauci

https://slaynews.com/news/skeleton-crawls-from-faucis-closet-shows-him-saying-benefits-of-gain-of-function-research-outweighed-pandemic-risk/

In a newly resurfaced paper from 2012, Dr. Anthony Fauci argued that the benefits of gain-of-function research are worth the increased risk of a potential pandemic-causing lab accident.

Despite the risks of a pandemic, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” writing: “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?

“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?




“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

this weasel must pay.

Calypso Jones wrote:https://slaynews.com/news/skeleton-crawls-from-faucis-closet-shows-him-saying-benefits-of-gain-of-function-research-outweighed-pandemic-risk/

In a newly resurfaced paper from 2012, Dr. Anthony Fauci argued that the benefits of gain-of-function research are worth the increased risk of a potential pandemic-causing lab accident.

Despite the risks of a pandemic, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” writing: “In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?

“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?


“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

Evil, narcissistic, little bass turd.

Gollum...

Criminal.

The BEST light is, he took a risk; discounted it...and that risk came to fruition.

Hold him criminally liable. At the VERY LEAST, strip him of his pension and assets.

Of course, it's far deeper than that. He's in bed with Davos Man; save the world by eradicating humanity.

But we'll never get a trial on THAT evidence.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/09/26/breaking-fauci-snuck-into-cia-hq-to-influence-covid-origin-report/

Genocidalist working with corrupt FBI to foist false story of the covid origins to protect his own corrupt butt.

https://nypost.com/2023/10/13/fauci-adviser-who-allegedly-deleted-federal-records-subpoenaed-in-house-covid-19-probe/?dicbo=v2-wnuo0Nq/amp

“This obstruction will not be tolerated,” Wenstrup warned in a letter informing NIH Acting Director Lawrence Tabak about the subpoena issued to Morens, which called the allegations against the NIAID employee “highly concerning.”

“The documents of Dr. Morens are potentially necessary to inform this investigation, including but not limited to his knowledge of information regarding the origins of COVID-19,” the letter continues.

Wenstrup argues that the documents potentially deleted from on Morens personal email account may point to an effort by government officials to cover up evidence that the virus which led to the coronavirus pandemic came from a Chinese lab.  

evil dwarf needs to be in jail.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/study-finds-higher-incidence-of-covid-19-among-consistent-mask-wearers-5536488?utm_source=epochHG&utm_campaign=CFP&src_src=epochHG&src_cmp=CFP

little weasel bastard...only the ignorant would be extolling this cretin's alleged virtues.

People who wore protective masks were found to be more likely to contract COVID-19 infections than those who didn't, according to a recent Norwegian study.

The peer-reviewed study, published in the journal Epidemiology and Infection on Nov. 13, analyzed mask use among 3,209 individuals from Norway. Researchers followed them for 17 days, and then asked the participants about their use of masks. The team found that there was a higher incidence of testing positive for COVID-19 among people who used masks more frequently.
Among individuals who “never or almost never” wore masks, 8.6 percent tested positive. That rose to 15 percent among participants who “sometimes” used masks, and to 15.1 percent among those who “almost always or always” wore them.