Fani Willis' Legal (and romantic) situation

I call her Fanny.
She calls herself Fawny.

Others might (correctly) call her Foney.

Still others may (also correctly) call her Funny ... but not in a good way.

How about, "Fatty."

We know what they call men who take money to service unattractive women, do we not?

That's what this Wade dood is.

"I'm JUST A GIGALO...everywhere I go...people stop and talk about me...."

I"m thinking TRUMPCURSE workin' OVERTIME.

Not looking good for Fani.....but the judge MAY still pull her fat fani out the fire.'

Fani gets primary challengers just before deadlines expire.

https://twitter.com/jimmyfailla/status/1766134559890977186

I"m thinking people are sick and tired of corrupt democrats;

Well by now you know that the judge is a cowardly feminized, racist moron scared of losing his job if he punishes a black racist fatty boombalatty.  He  up fo re-election.  

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-in-trumps-georgia-case-warns-of-potential-future-gag-order-for-willis-5608478?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

Maybe the pushback and ridicule of his protection of two purjerers is starting to sting.

Calypso Jones wrote:Well by now you know that the judge is a cowardly feminized, racist moron scared of losing his job if he punishes a black racist fatty boombalatty.  He  up fo re-election.  

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-in-trumps-georgia-case-warns-of-potential-future-gag-order-for-willis-5608478?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

Maybe the pushback and ridicule of his protection of two purjerers is starting to sting.

How do these scum bag democrats ALWAYS get away from obvious violations of the law?
It's  sickening.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/a-significant-setback-for-fani-willis/ar-BB1jYhOL

She HAS exposed herself to the nation.

While McAfee’s decision is, in its broad strokes, a win for Willis, it comes with all kinds of tough language about her conduct. It also raises questions about how the matter might linger in the months to come and color views of the prosecution:


McAfee wrote that while the conflict of interest wasn’t proved, “an odor of mendacity remains.”

He said that there are “reasonable questions” about whether Willis and Wade “testified untruthfully” about when their relationship began. (That timing was a crux of the complaint, with the defendants trying to prove that the relationship began before Wade was appointed.)

McAfee emphasized that his proceedings couldn’t “ferret out every instance of potential dishonesty from each witness” because of constraints.

But he suggestively pointed to other forums that could shed more light, including the state bar, a state ethics commission and the Georgia General Assembly. (As it happens, the legislature passed a law, signed by Gov. Brian Kemp (R) this week, empowering a panel to investigate and potentially punish “rogue” local prosecutors. While not explicitly targeted at Willis, the ruling could provide fodder for such a process.)

McAfee said Willis had displayed a “tremendous lapse in judgment” and cited “the unprofessional manner” of her animated, defiant testimony last month. He also called a speech she delivered decrying the attacks on her “legally improper” because it suggested racial motivations.

That last bullet point is a particularly stinging review from the judge, who once counted Willis as his supervisor.

And notably, it comes after Willis was rebuked by another judge in 2022 in similar terms. Willis had held a fundraiser for a Democratic candidate who would ultimately face one of the Trump allies she was scrutinizing. “It’s a ‘What are you thinking?’ moment,” that judge said in blocking Willis from investigating the man, now-Lt. Gov. Burt Jones (R). “The optics are horrific.”