Remember the mother and child hit crossing alley seemingly intentionally by 17yo driver

Red Lily wrote:I don't know if the baby survived but I assume he/she did because I cannot find anywhere that has said otherwise.

Thanks. Seems there'd be more drama to the situation had the baby died.

Another marvel. "Rachel" has been able to keep her identity unknown. Can't tell ya how much I admire that.

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I don't know if the baby survived but I assume he/she did because I cannot find anywhere that has said otherwise.

Thanks.  Seems there'd be more drama to the situation had the baby died.  

Another marvel.  "Rachel" has been able to keep her identity unknown.  Can't tell ya how much I admire that.

It's unfortunate that the name of the perpetrator was kept silent (until his death) due to his age. I'm against that. Name and shame in violent crimes no matter how old they are. Violent psychotics shouldn't get a free pass just because they are underage.

The mother and baby both survived the hit and run 17yo driver.

Calypso Jones wrote:The mother and baby both survived the hit and run 17yo driver.

ah.  Miraculously.  Thank you.

.

somebody was surely watching out for them.

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I don't know if the baby survived but I assume he/she did because I cannot find anywhere that has said otherwise.

Thanks.  Seems there'd be more drama to the situation had the baby died.  

Another marvel.  "Rachel" has been able to keep her identity unknown.  Can't tell ya how much I admire that.

It's unfortunate that the name of the perpetrator was kept silent (until his death) due to his age.  I'm against that.  Name and shame in violent crimes no matter how old they are.  Violent psychotics shouldn't get a free pass just because they are underage.

Our legal systems set an age at which you will be held accountable . for better of worse

vege57 wrote:

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I don't know if the baby survived but I assume he/she did because I cannot find anywhere that has said otherwise.

Thanks.  Seems there'd be more drama to the situation had the baby died.  

Another marvel.  "Rachel" has been able to keep her identity unknown.  Can't tell ya how much I admire that.

It's unfortunate that the name of the perpetrator was kept silent (until his death) due to his age.  I'm against that.  Name and shame in violent crimes no matter how old they are.  Violent psychotics shouldn't get a free pass just because they are underage.

Our legal systems set an age at which you will be held accountable . for better of worse

Those 2 little murderous pricks in the UK who tortured and murdered that poor little James Bulger were protected and even given multiple new identities and when they were released at age 18 they re-offended.

Name and shame I say.  People have a right to know who they live next door to.  They shouldn't have lifelong privacy.  They shouldn't have any privacy at all.  I don't care how old they are.

And to make it even more ridiculous if you try to search their addresses you can end up in prison.

Red Lily wrote:

vege57 wrote:

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I don't know if the baby survived but I assume he/she did because I cannot find anywhere that has said otherwise.

Thanks.  Seems there'd be more drama to the situation had the baby died.  

Another marvel.  "Rachel" has been able to keep her identity unknown.  Can't tell ya how much I admire that.

It's unfortunate that the name of the perpetrator was kept silent (until his death) due to his age.  I'm against that.  Name and shame in violent crimes no matter how old they are.  Violent psychotics shouldn't get a free pass just because they are underage.

Our legal systems set an age at which you will be held accountable . for better of worse

Those 2 little murderous pricks in the UK who tortured and murdered that poor little James Bulger were protected and even given multiple new identities and when they were released at age 18 they re-offended.

Name and shame I say.  People have a right to know who they live next door to.  They shouldn't have lifelong privacy.  They shouldn't have any privacy at all.  I don't care how old they are.

And to make it even more ridiculous if you try to search their addresses you can end up in prison.

"Those 2 little murderous pricks in the UK who tortured and murdered that poor little James Bulger were protected and even given multiple new identities and when they were released at age 18 they re-offended.""

I didnt say I agreed with it,

Under the previous government we had a three strikes law , Labour cancelled it. . I feel confident it will be brought back in again

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I don't know if the baby survived but I assume he/she did because I cannot find anywhere that has said otherwise.

Thanks.  Seems there'd be more drama to the situation had the baby died.  

Another marvel.  "Rachel" has been able to keep her identity unknown.  Can't tell ya how much I admire that.

It's unfortunate that the name of the perpetrator was kept silent (until his death) due to his age.  I'm against that.  Name and shame in violent crimes no matter how old they are.  Violent psychotics shouldn't get a free pass just because they are underage.

Agreed. Hold back until found guilty. Then, all bets are off.

IIRC, (and I very well might not), keeping the names of minorities out of the news started with protecting the innocent. Then, enter the Liberal, and it was decided that it was discrimination to protect one minority, and not the other. a.k.a., the innocent, and the guilty. Or, if you name one - the guilty - you've got to name the other.

Stupid stuff, yeah, but of course the conservatives went along with protecting both, rather than expose the innocent. Looks like they allowed themselves to be set up into an either/or situation. But then, Republicans are famous for it.