Republican lieutenant governor says he did not vote for Herschel Walker

Walking out of the voting booth without voting for either candidate is the same as voting for the Communist, (i.e. Democrat).

To claim that not voting somehow makes you superior or that you have more integrity is just kidding yourself. I am sure that the people who did nothing against the Nazi's tried to claim that they had more integrity also.

Evil prospers when good people do nothing.

RV wrote:Walking out of the voting booth without voting for either candidate is the same as voting for the Communist, (i.e. Democrat).

To claim that not voting somehow makes you superior or that you have more integrity is just kidding yourself. I am sure that the people who did nothing against the Nazi's tried to claim that they had more integrity also.

Evil prospers when good people do nothing.

You condemn the left for voting for incompetent Democrats but are happy with doing the exact same thing on your side just to follow party lines? You know what that's called? It's called hypocrisy and I see no integrity in such actions from either side.

RV wrote:Walking out of the voting booth without voting for either candidate is the same as voting for the Communist, (i.e. Democrat).

To claim that not voting somehow makes you superior or that you have more integrity is just kidding yourself. I am sure that the people who did nothing against the Nazi's tried to claim that they had more integrity also.

Evil prospers when good people do nothing.

Oh just drop down off that superior high horse you're riding already.  The saddle's too large for you, anyway.

Refraining from putting up with useless candidates who will do your business more harm than good, in the long run, is a positive.


The lesser of two evils is still EVIL.

2cent wrote:

Wyatt Earp wrote:There are only 2 candidates in run-offs by design. I'm not even from Georgia and I get it. He either voted Democrat and is lying, or he's dumber than shit.

Why is it dumb to refrain from voting for a person you have no faith in to execute the duties of the job?

If what Duncan is saying is true, he went to the ballot box not knowing that the only options would be Walker and Warnock. That would be dumb because run-off elections are specifically designed to eliminate the third party. A politician from Georgia should know that.

Instead, it looks like he's just grandstanding to hurt Walker. Duncan damn sure voted for Warnock. The Republicans who run Georgia, much like my own state, are anti-Trump. They're okay with Warnock winning because he's an evil, bought and paid for establishment fuckwad and Walker isn't. Walker is going to lose, but it'll be through voter fraud, not voters.

Asked if there’s anything Walker could have done to win his vote, Duncan said he and other Republicans across the country “just want real leadership.” Duncan said Walker should have pushed back on Donald Trump’s false claims of election fraud, and also denounced his recent dinner with white supremacist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes instead of staying silent about it.

“Those were ways to convince the suburbs that you were a serious player that didn’t want to be Donald Trump’s puppet,” Duncan told CNN’s John Berman

https://news.yahoo.com/georgias-gop-lieutenant-governor-reveals-125042829.html

So, just so we're clear, it's not about Walker, it's about Trump. And Fuentes is a piss poor excuse to not vote for Walker, as if Trump is supposed to know who everyone he meets are. The race should be a referendum on Biden, not Trump (Trump might not even be the 2024 Republican nominee!). I'd wager 95% of the people who knew who Nick Fuentes was were white supremacists. Really lame arguments. Sounds like the anti-American McCainites in Arizona.

Geoff Duncan is a fag. I'd take a Walker win over that inbred son of a bitch winning any day.

In the general election, most times the voter is voting AGAINST something or someone.

It may well be that the preferred-party candidate is subpar; but the reality is, the Other candidate is often far worse.

By withholding a vote, or voting third-party or write-in...you help the candidate you're LEAST likely to pick. A withheld R vote helps the D. A withheld D vote, helps the R.

NO candidate is perfect. You have to go with the lesser of two evils...and yes, you'll always have the lesser of two evils. The only perfect candidate...to me, IS ME. No one can do it as good, as righteously, as I can.

But I'm not in any election. So I have to choose between deeply-flawed persons who often have lived for a time in the Swamp. Or who have worked in other unsavory businesses...like, say, Trump. I wasn't enthused about him (he did far better than I expected) but the alternative was magnitudes worse.

So I voted. Voted R.

Casey Jones wrote:In the general election, most times the voter is voting AGAINST something or someone.  

It may well be that the preferred-party candidate is subpar; but the reality is, the Other candidate is often far worse.

By withholding a vote, or voting third-party or write-in...you help the candidate you're LEAST likely to pick.  A withheld R vote helps the D.  A withheld D vote, helps the R.

NO candidate is perfect.  You have to go with the lesser of two evils...and yes, you'll always have the lesser of two evils.  The only perfect candidate...to me, IS ME.  No one can do it as good, as righteously, as I can.

But I'm not in any election.  So I have to choose between deeply-flawed persons who often have lived for a time in the Swamp.  Or who have worked in other unsavory businesses...like, say, Trump.  I wasn't enthused about him (he did far better than I expected) but the alternative was magnitudes worse.

So I voted.  Voted R.

I'd understand staying home if it's McCain vs. Obama. Walker vs. Warnock would be an easier choice for me to make. Even if Walker isn't that bright, well, the Democrats have a retarded pedophile as the standard-bearer of their party. And that itself proves Duncan isn't worried about Walker's personal flaws, he just doesn't want anyone who isn't corrupt to win.

Red Lily wrote:

RV wrote:Walking out of the voting booth without voting for either candidate is the same as voting for the Communist, (i.e. Democrat).

To claim that not voting somehow makes you superior or that you have more integrity is just kidding yourself. I am sure that the people who did nothing against the Nazi's tried to claim that they had more integrity also.

Evil prospers when good people do nothing.

You condemn the left for voting for incompetent Democrats but are happy with doing the exact same thing on your side just to follow party lines?   You know what that's called?  It's called hypocrisy and I see no integrity in such actions from either side.

First off, I "condemn" no one. If anyone feels guilty that is their problem, I merely stated the truth. Secondly, as far as I'm concerned, ALL Democrats are incompetent because they represent only special interests NOT the majority.

What you may call "hypocrisy" is your opinion and not the truth. I'm not commenting to win your praise, I was commenting to put an air of truth into this discussion. If that bothers you, I cannot help that. Liberals throw around words like "integrity", "hypocrisy", "rights", "Constitutional Crisis", "Democracy" and other buzz words to stir up emotions and get their socialist policies rammed through rather than actual truth and facts.

2cent wrote:

RV wrote:Walking out of the voting booth without voting for either candidate is the same as voting for the Communist, (i.e. Democrat).

To claim that not voting somehow makes you superior or that you have more integrity is just kidding yourself. I am sure that the people who did nothing against the Nazi's tried to claim that they had more integrity also.

Evil prospers when good people do nothing.

Oh just drop down off that superior high horse you're riding already.  The saddle's too large for you, anyway.

Refraining from putting up with useless candidates who will do your business more harm than good, in the long run, is a positive.


The lesser of two evils is still EVIL.

A politician is worthless so, some claim that they are not voting so that the "lesser of two evils" isn't elected. What actually happens is that an evil Communist is elected overwhelmingly because some refrained from voting to feel like they have "integrity" or "superiority".

I have NEVER said that I was "superior", "had more integrity" or that I was somehow "better" than others. What I have said is that I vote in every election and have since I was old enough to legally vote. I believe YOU are the one who claims to be "superior", "have more integrity" or somehow are more down to earth" since you accuse me of being on a "high horse", (again NOT something I in any way said nor thought).

Wyatt Earp wrote:

Casey Jones wrote:In the general election, most times the voter is voting AGAINST something or someone.  

It may well be that the preferred-party candidate is subpar; but the reality is, the Other candidate is often far worse.

By withholding a vote, or voting third-party or write-in...you help the candidate you're LEAST likely to pick.  A withheld R vote helps the D.  A withheld D vote, helps the R.

NO candidate is perfect.  You have to go with the lesser of two evils...and yes, you'll always have the lesser of two evils.  The only perfect candidate...to me, IS ME.  No one can do it as good, as righteously, as I can.

But I'm not in any election.  So I have to choose between deeply-flawed persons who often have lived for a time in the Swamp.  Or who have worked in other unsavory businesses...like, say, Trump.  I wasn't enthused about him (he did far better than I expected) but the alternative was magnitudes worse.

So I voted.  Voted R.

I'd understand staying home if it's McCain vs. Obama. Walker vs. Warnock would be an easier choice for me to make. Even if Walker isn't that bright, well, the Democrats have a retarded pedophile as the standard-bearer of their party. And that itself proves Duncan isn't worried about Walker's personal flaws, he just doesn't want anyone who isn't corrupt to win.

Personally, I CAN'T understand "staying home" regardless of who is running nor what the issue is. Voting is our civic duty and responsibility. The reason that we have so many America Haters in government is because people "stayed home" or refused to vote because they found the candidates to be as flawed and human as they are.