Bombshell: Official Government Docs Comparison Suggests “Fully Vaccinated” Are Developing AIDS

More:

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/04/evidence-covid-vaccines-cause-ai-d-s/

As far as SOME know, aids is a sexually transmitted disease. Supposedly one cannot "catch Cancer" and yet, the ads are all claiming that a simple HPV virus can cause a form of Cancer. The narrative is whatever makes the most money for big phama and is politically expedient...

The WuFlu is 99% survivable WITHOUT a "Vaccine" and yet, what is the government and big pharma advocating?

@Calypso Jones @Red Lily @Lone Gunman

Team America! F*ck yeah!

" The Pope has got it , and so do you...."

Why Do Some Covid-19 “Vaccine” Side Effects Resemble Symptoms of HIV? – Discern Report

EvilCat Breath wrote:AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease.  It is not spontaneously developed.

The "leaders" told us that you couldn't transmit Cancer either...

Abby08 wrote:

EvilCat Breath wrote:AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease.  It is not spontaneously developed.

Yeah........so unless they're injecting people with AIDS infected bodily fluids...........

Since the actual make up of the "Vaccine" is a trade secret, we may never really know. Big Pharma doesn't talk about how aborted fetuses are used in the making of the "Vaccine" either. How many aborted AIDS babies or drug addicted babies are involved in the making of the "Vaccine"?

Crusader wrote:I have family members vaccinated as early as January and they are fine.  I'm not taking the jab because I don't need it and I don't appreciate the coercion, but I don't think it's the death sentence you are claiming. (this time)  I just think big pharma is milking the tax payers for big bucks.

There is a whole lot of information being withheld, "deleted" or otherwise unreleased. I cannot say one way or the other. One thing I CAN say is that I won't take it until and unless there is FULL disclosure and transparency regarding the origins of the WuFlu and the "Vaccine(s)" and FULL investigations. I don't expect that will ever happen. The fact that threats and intimidation were used to promote the "Vaccine", tells me that there is much more to this than the public has been or ever will be told.

RV wrote:

Crusader wrote:I have family members vaccinated as early as January and they are fine.  I'm not taking the jab because I don't need it and I don't appreciate the coercion, but I don't think it's the death sentence you are claiming. (this time)  I just think big pharma is milking the tax payers for big bucks.

There is a whole lot of information being withheld, "deleted" or otherwise unreleased. I cannot say one way or the other. One thing I CAN say is that I won't take it until and unless there is FULL disclosure and transparency regarding the origins of the WuFlu and the "Vaccine(s)" and FULL investigations. I don't expect that will ever happen. The fact that threats and intimidation were used to promote the "Vaccine", tells me that there is much more to this than the public has been or ever will be told.  

No matter what you were told you'd never believe it anyway.

Red Lily wrote:

RV wrote:

Crusader wrote:I have family members vaccinated as early as January and they are fine.  I'm not taking the jab because I don't need it and I don't appreciate the coercion, but I don't think it's the death sentence you are claiming. (this time)  I just think big pharma is milking the tax payers for big bucks.

There is a whole lot of information being withheld, "deleted" or otherwise unreleased. I cannot say one way or the other. One thing I CAN say is that I won't take it until and unless there is FULL disclosure and transparency regarding the origins of the WuFlu and the "Vaccine(s)" and FULL investigations. I don't expect that will ever happen. The fact that threats and intimidation were used to promote the "Vaccine", tells me that there is much more to this than the public has been or ever will be told.  

No matter what you were told you'd never believe it anyway.  

At this point? NO. There was never a reason to hide information nor lie about it. Would I trust ANYTHING they try to cram down my throat now? NO.

I would have to see PROOF, EVIDENCE and FACTS at this point. (Fool/lie to me once, shame on you. Fool/lie to me twice, shame on me)