Arguments for Proof of God

vege57 wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:YOU are ignoring ALL evidence for the existence of an Intelligent Being (otherwise known as GOD)  You have no excuse other than your....obtuseness.

With all due respect, there is not one iota of evidence, You guys sit around in your bible study groups and blow smoke up each others asses, it wouldn't matter how outrageous the claim you would all lap it up

IF there was no evidence and a person  chooses to believe there is a God just as some people believe in ETs and UFOs...what does it matter to you.   WHY do you feel compelled to always come in and say, 'no evidence' or 'this is  bunkum' or its equivalent?   I think i know the reason.

Calypso Jones wrote:
IF there was no evidence and a person  chooses to believe there is a God just as some people believe in ETs and UFOs...what does it matter to you.   WHY do you feel compelled to always come in and say, 'no evidence' or 'this is  bunkum' or its equivalent?   I think i know the reason.

With such people there will never be any "evidence".

this says it all Leon. in the southern eagleford trend, the top formation to the bottom is sequenced as such: eagle ford, austin chalk, buda limestone, georgetown. in the northern eagleford trend, the sequence is: buda limestone, georgetown, austin chalk, eagleford. so you see, its not only broken and flipped upsidedown, its shuffled too. so yes, God created the heavens and earth in one day. litteraly

Calypso Jones wrote:

vege57 wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:YOU are ignoring ALL evidence for the existence of an Intelligent Being (otherwise known as GOD)  You have no excuse other than your....obtuseness.

With all due respect, there is not one iota of evidence, You guys sit around in your bible study groups and blow smoke up each others asses, it wouldn't matter how outrageous the claim you would all lap it up

IF there was no evidence and a person  chooses to believe there is a God just as some people believe in ETs and UFOs...what does it matter to you.   WHY do you feel compelled to always come in and say, 'no evidence' or 'this is  bunkum' or its equivalent?   I think i know the reason.

There is certainly a better argument for life on other planets than there is for the existence of a God, , go out some time and look at the stars, they are all suns that most likely have planets cycling them that could have life on them , and for every star you can see there a billions that you are unable to observe with the naked eye

Leon Xiv wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:
IF there was no evidence and a person  chooses to believe there is a God just as some people believe in ETs and UFOs...what does it matter to you.   WHY do you feel compelled to always come in and say, 'no evidence' or 'this is  bunkum' or its equivalent?   I think i know the reason.

With such people there will never be any "evidence".

Leon you have no evidence, you have a belief, that's not evidence

jirqoadai wrote:this says it all Leon. in the southern eagleford trend, the top formation to the bottom is sequenced as such: eagle ford, austin chalk, buda limestone, georgetown. in the northern eagleford trend, the sequence is: buda limestone, georgetown, austin chalk, eagleford. so you see, its not only broken and flipped upsidedown, its shuffled  too. so yes, God created the heavens and earth in one day. litteraly

He must have stayed up late that day lol

vege57 wrote:Leon you have no evidence, you have a belief, that's not evidence

What would you accept as 'evidence'?

Leon Xiv wrote:

vege57 wrote:Leon you have no evidence, you have a belief, that's not evidence

What would you accept as 'evidence'?

Something that could be verified with physical evidence,

vege57 wrote:

Leon Xiv wrote:

vege57 wrote:Leon you have no evidence, you have a belief, that's not evidence

What would you accept as 'evidence'?

Something that could be verified with physical evidence,  

Insurance policies reference "acts of God".

Leon Xiv wrote:

vege57 wrote:

Leon Xiv wrote:

vege57 wrote:Leon you have no evidence, you have a belief, that's not evidence

What would you accept as 'evidence'?

Something that could be verified with physical evidence,  

Insurance policies reference "acts of God".

lol, nice try, but no bananas,

""act of God
phrase of act
an instance of uncontrollable natural forces in operation.""

Just a figure of speech Leon