The Trouble with Kamala

Keith wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:A vote for Trump would be a protest vote and far more effective.  People don't want any kennedy's anymore... At least they'll allow them in congress..that's as far as it goes.    Same for Bushes, cheneys, clintons, obamaos,

I already voted for Trump in the last two elections. I can't bring myself to do it again. The "GOP" needs a fresh start. Running Trump every four years is getting stale. He's doesn't have the fire he had eight years ago. You can vote for him if you want, but I'll pass.

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Don't know how to tell you this but, a "protest vote" is really a vote FOR Kameltoe. Failing to vote at all is also a vote for Kameltoe. If you really want to put another Dem in then make your "protest vote" or fail to vote at all.

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Apparently you enjoy wars, high prices, inflation, DEI, CRT, BLM, disarmament, lawfare, higher taxes, blatant discrimination, antisemitism, being invaded by terrorists, rapid growth of government, government corruption, a ruined economy, skyrocketing crime rates, contraband entering the country, etc., etc., etc.

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Apparently you enjoy wars, high prices, inflation, DEI, CRT, BLM, disarmament, lawfare, higher taxes, blatant discrimination, antisemitism, being invaded by terrorists, rapid growth of government, government corruption, a ruined economy, skyrocketing crime rates, contraband entering the country, etc., etc., etc.

Actually, I don't. But I just don't trust Trump to be able to stop all of that. And besides, the idea that one man could do that is ludicrous. The rot is deep and multilayered. It goes far beyond the president. Everything needs overhauled, from top to bottom.

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Don't know how to tell you this but, a "protest vote" is really a vote FOR Kameltoe. Failing to vote at all is also a vote for Kameltoe. If you really want to put another Dem in then make your "protest vote" or fail to vote at all.

No, choosing not to vote is a vote for no one. If Candidate #1 gets 1,000 votes, Candidate #2 gets 1,000 votes and Candidate #3 gets 500 votes, Candidates #1 and #2 will still have 1,000 votes each. Their vote count doesn't get reduced.

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:
No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Don't know how to tell you this but, a "protest vote" is really a vote FOR Kameltoe. Failing to vote at all is also a vote for Kameltoe. If you really want to put another Dem in then make your "protest vote" or fail to vote at all.

No, choosing not to vote is a vote for no one. If Candidate #1 gets 1,000 votes, Candidate #2 gets 1,000 votes and Candidate #3 gets 500 votes, Candidates #1 and #2 will still have 1,000 votes each. Their vote count doesn't get reduced.

Apparently you have never studied nor been educated in statistics. You can lie to yourself that your failure to vote or your "protest vote" doesn't matter but, numerous past elections prove otherwise.

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Apparently you enjoy wars, high prices, inflation, DEI, CRT, BLM, disarmament, lawfare, higher taxes, blatant discrimination, antisemitism, being invaded by terrorists, rapid growth of government, government corruption, a ruined economy, skyrocketing crime rates, contraband entering the country, etc., etc., etc.

Actually, I don't. But I just don't trust Trump to be able to stop all of that. And besides, the idea that one man could do that is ludicrous. The rot is deep and multilayered. It goes far beyond the president. Everything needs overhauled, from top to bottom.

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

Apparently you enjoy wars, high prices, inflation, DEI, CRT, BLM, disarmament, lawfare, higher taxes, blatant discrimination, antisemitism, being invaded by terrorists, rapid growth of government, government corruption, a ruined economy, skyrocketing crime rates, contraband entering the country, etc., etc., etc.

Actually, I don't. But I just don't trust Trump to be able to stop all of that. And besides, the idea that one man could do that is ludicrous. The rot is deep and multilayered. It goes far beyond the president. Everything needs overhauled, from top to bottom.