The Trouble with Kamala

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

Right, just keep telling yourself that. Maybe you'll begin to believe that fantasy!

I dont have any skin in the game. its just an opinion, time will tell, The issue i see is that if he loses you guys will claim it was stolen

vege57 wrote:

RV wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

Right, just keep telling yourself that. Maybe you'll begin to believe that fantasy!

I dont have any skin in the game. its just an opinion, time will tell, The issue i see is that if he loses you guys will claim it was stolen

For sure the fix will be in play.
Dominion machines and mail in ballots.

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

Kameltoe wasn't popular as a VP so despite what the Dems are trying to push now, she hasn't grown in popularity. Kameltoe was called a Communist before, she has not changed any. Kameltoe says that she plans to raise corporate taxes, income taxes and spend more gov't. money than Bribem.

That excitement for Joe sure passed onto one of the most anoying and unpopular dem pols really quick didn't it. Seeing the man on the street interviews of the old people in florida says to me.... 'braindead'.

Calypso Jones wrote:That excitement for Joe sure passed onto one of the most anoying and unpopular dem pols really quick doesn't it. Seeing the man on the street interviews of the old people in florida says to me.... 'braindead'.

Brain-fogged.

From you-know-what.

Just moar proof, if you need it, that this is neither anecdotal nor accidental. IT WAS PLANNED AND IT IS COMING TO BE.

There isn't one question in my mind that the Dems believed that President Trump would be assassinated so they could express their condolences to the masses while telling them to vote for Kameltoe. Yes, this was all planned by the Dems...

Quark wrote:

Keith wrote:

vege57 wrote:The prob you guys have is that ultimately she may be considered more desirable than trump, The swingers in the middle will probably vote fore her, The only thing that will save BigT is if she falls over in the debate

No, they'll probably say Trump pushed her, even if he wasn't anywhere near her.

Like I said before, unless there's a big attack on Israel right before the election, Kamala will have it in the bag.

Personally, I don't want either one to win, because ugly things will happen no matter what.

RFK, Jr. should be having support up the wazoo by now, but it seems like the American (m)asses will always love their pre-approved, puppet politicians.

Hell, they could just stop holding elections altogether and have the System announce who they want, and the vast majority of the plebs will happily swallow it up.

We're way past the point of fixing this country through political solutions. I say let the Marxists run this country into the ground, and once we get on par with nations like Venezuela, perhaps the people who haven't already starved to death will finally get the message.

No matter how many votes RFK Jr. gets he won't have the electoral college and without that he can't win the presidency.

I'm quite aware that they will never allow RFK to get "elected" (more like selected). But that's not the point in voting for him. It's meant to be a protest vote and let the System know that you do not approve of the media-government complex's pre-approved candidates (in this case, Kamala and Trump). I know damn well I'd be going into this thing with the full knowledge that either one of those two will get in.

Of course, I might change my mind and decide not to vote at all. I don't even know if he's going to be on the ballot in my state.

A vote for Trump would be a protest vote and far more effective. People don't want any kennedy's anymore... At least they'll allow them in congress..that's as far as it goes. Same for Bushes, cheneys, clintons, obamaos,

Calypso Jones wrote:A vote for Trump would be a protest vote and far more effective.  People don't want any kennedy's anymore... At least they'll allow them in congress..that's as far as it goes.    Same for Bushes, cheneys, clintons, obamaos,

I already voted for Trump in the last two elections. I can't bring myself to do it again. The "GOP" needs a fresh start. Running Trump every four years is getting stale. He's doesn't have the fire he had eight years ago. You can vote for him if you want, but I'll pass.

something to ponder before demeaning all jews.

Romans 9:6-

6 Well then, has God failed to fulfill his promise to Israel? No, for not all who are born into the nation of Israel are truly members of God’s people! 7 Being descendants of Abraham doesn’t make them truly Abraham’s children. For the Scriptures say, “Isaac is the son through whom your descendants will be counted,”[d] though Abraham had other children, too. 8 This means that Abraham’s physical descendants are not necessarily children of God. Only the children of the promise are considered to be Abraham’s children. 9 For God had promised, “I will return about this time next year, and Sarah will have a son.”[e]

10 This son was our ancestor Isaac. When he married Rebekah, she gave birth to twins.[f] 11 But before they were born, before they had done anything good or bad, she received a message from God. (This message shows that God chooses people according to his own purposes; 12 he calls people, but not according to their good or bad works.) She was told, “Your older son will serve your younger son.”[g] 13 In the words of the Scriptures, “I loved Jacob, but I rejected Esau.”[h]

14 Are we saying, then, that God was unfair? Of course not! 15 For God said to Moses,

“I will show mercy to anyone I choose,
and I will show compassion to anyone I choose.”[i]