Weapons of 'War'?

Since liberal Democrats keep referring to an AR-15 as a 'weapon of war', how come no 'AR-15' has EVER been issued to Military personnel? No AR-15 has ever been to an actual war. How is it that Military personnel are issued M-16's rather than the liberal proclaimed AR-15 'weapon of war'? Could it be that they are once again lying? Could it be that they are once again showing their blatant and deliberate ignorance of firearms?

Is the AR-15 and the M-16 the same weapon? NO! Not even close. The M-16's are select fire, fully automatic 'assault' weapons while an AR-15 is a semi-automatic civilian rifle with NO select fire components and no full automatic nor select fire capability!

Good catch! I guess it suggests that the target of confiscation is civilian ownership. Ask an authority, like Nancy Pelosi.

The AR has NEVER been a 'weapon of war'. In fact, no self respecting soldier would EVER take a civilian AR into a 'war' because they would be no match for the REAL weapons of war, (aka assault weapons), that were being used against them! There are many other differences between the Civilian AR and the Military M-16 but, they are too numerous to go into here.

Blind leading the blind. This is exactly the kind of thing that costs a ton of money in court and for no reason other than liberals are butt stupid, which is all fine and well with them.

Remind you of anyone?

Lummy wrote:Blind leading the blind. This is exactly the kind of thing that costs a ton of money in court and for no reason other than liberals are butt stupid, which is all fine and well with them.

Remind you of anyone?

The Demented in chief, Kameltoe Harris, Chuck Schumer, Jerry Nadler, Nancy Pelosi, John Fedderman, Adam (liar) Schiff... the list seems endless!