MEGA Nord Stream Pipeline Leaks

i was asking the loon from NOZ. he asked why bidet would. then never answered his own question. i personaly wouldve flowed it and then delivered a train of butane. that wouldve screwed everything up seven ways to sunday.

vege57 wrote:Are we not allowed to comment on your posts 2, lol

Oh, for pity's sake.

I said, "I heard that explosions were reported."

You said: "You wouldn't hear an explosion." IOW, inferring that I said, "People HEARD explosions."

Good night.

2? those were NOT explosions. they were IMPLOSIONS. and yes. anyone who says they were explosions, doesnt know enough to comment about it. YOU were asking for clarification. which is good. dont stop. a knowledgeable person in the good camp is worth more than 100 retards at DVille

jirqoadai wrote:2? those were NOT explosions. they were IMPLOSIONS

1) What are the "sound" differences between an implosion and an explosion underwater? Just using listening/audio alone, how do you know the difference

2) How are you so absolutely sure it was an implosion? Is there some evidence released by some intelligence agency?

Great American wrote:

jirqoadai wrote:2? those were NOT explosions. they were IMPLOSIONS

1) What are the "sound" differences between an implosion and an explosion underwater? Just using listening/audio alone, how do you know the difference

2) How are you so absolutely sure it was an implosion? Is there some evidence released by some intelligence agency?

an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat unless it was huge. like wave creating boat drowning. and then im pretty sure it would only push the pipeline over about five feet.

jirqoadai wrote:an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat unless it was huge. like wave creating boat drowning. and then im pretty sure it would only push the pipeline over about five feet.

When ships hit mines the mines do a damn good job of ripping a hole in the hulls. Why does that work so well but an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat?

Great American wrote:

jirqoadai wrote:an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat unless it was huge. like wave creating boat drowning. and then im pretty sure it would only push the pipeline over about five feet.

When ships hit mines the mines do a damn good job of ripping a hole in the hulls. Why does that work so well but an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat?

the Kursk i believe hit two mines. thats my take on it. two 66pound mines. ( id need to double check my submarine books to make sure about 66lbs). the germans made a 28 mm krupt special hulled sub. just one. you check and see how much explosive force it wouldve needed to crack it.

2cent wrote:

vege57 wrote:Are we not allowed to comment on your posts 2, lol

Oh, for pity's sake.  

I said, "I heard that explosions were reported."

You said: "You wouldn't hear an explosion."  IOW, inferring that I said, "People HEARD explosions."

Good night.

I still fail to see how that is putting words in your mouth ?

Sleep tight

my bad. the 66 is the closeness needed to activate the magnetic trigger. i belive the Minetorpedo-A carried 1,280 pounds of explosives. still reading about which kind of explosives it carried.

jirqoadai wrote:

Great American wrote:

jirqoadai wrote:an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat unless it was huge. like wave creating boat drowning. and then im pretty sure it would only push the pipeline over about five feet.

When ships hit mines the mines do a damn good job of ripping a hole in the hulls. Why does that work so well but an explosion next to the pipeline wouldnt do squat?

the Kursk i believe hit two mines. thats my take on it. two 66pound mines. ( id need to double check my submarine books to make sure about 66lbs). the germans made a 28 mm krupt special hulled sub. just one. you check and see how much explosive force it wouldve needed to crack it.

Well, since I am not educated on the subject I will defer to you. But I still don't know how you know the difference between 1k explosives imploding and 1k explosives exploding just by the sound. I think that was the context of this conversation right? Somebody "heard" the explosions. Your argument is that its simply not possible for reasons of physics. I am skeptical, but not educated enough on the subject to make an opposing argument

You would think by now that some pointyhead would have made a video on how such things are and are not possible, like they did with the twin towers.