Sunday Talks; Ratcliffe Questions DOJ/FBI Classified Designations in Mar-a-Lago Documents

In this lengthy interview with John Ratcliffe and Maria Bartiromo, the former Director of National Intelligence, the man who has likely seen every document that may have eventually ended up in Mar-a-Lago, is challenging the nature of the classified status of those documents.   Ratcliffe does not believe the Mar-a-Lago documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent ‘sources and methods’ used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.

Keep in mind that as the DNI during 2020, Ratcliffe saw the documents that eventually became the material President Trump declassified and left with the DOJ to release after the Durham investigation was complete.  If Ratcliffe’s suspicions are correct, and there is more valid reason to support his suspicions than oppose them, then the entire construct of the DOJ-NSD operation to retrieve those documents from Mar-a-Lago is factually one big cover-up operation.

2cent wrote:

In this lengthy interview with John Ratcliffe and Maria Bartiromo, the former Director of National Intelligence, the man who has likely seen every document that may have eventually ended up in Mar-a-Lago, is challenging the nature of the classified status of those documents.   Ratcliffe does not believe the Mar-a-Lago documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent ‘sources and methods’ used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.

Keep in mind that as the DNI during 2020, Ratcliffe saw the documents that eventually became the material President Trump declassified and left with the DOJ to release after the Durham investigation was complete.  If Ratcliffe’s suspicions are correct, and there is more valid reason to support his suspicions than oppose them, then the entire construct of the DOJ-NSD operation to retrieve those documents from Mar-a-Lago is factually one big cover-up operation.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/

Like we all suspected, the documents are most likely not 'Classified', nor Top Secret, and more likely papers that expose the FBI's wrong doing.  

FWIW, the interview isn't all that long.  12 mins.

Daily Bread wrote:

2cent wrote:

In this lengthy interview with John Ratcliffe and Maria Bartiromo, the former Director of National Intelligence, the man who has likely seen every document that may have eventually ended up in Mar-a-Lago, is challenging the nature of the classified status of those documents.   Ratcliffe does not believe the Mar-a-Lago documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent ‘sources and methods’ used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.

Keep in mind that as the DNI during 2020, Ratcliffe saw the documents that eventually became the material President Trump declassified and left with the DOJ to release after the Durham investigation was complete.  If Ratcliffe’s suspicions are correct, and there is more valid reason to support his suspicions than oppose them, then the entire construct of the DOJ-NSD operation to retrieve those documents from Mar-a-Lago is factually one big cover-up operation.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/

Like we all suspected, the documents are most likely not 'Classified', nor Top Secret, and more likely papers that expose the FBI's wrong doing.  

FWIW, the interview isn't all that long.  12 mins.

Ive been perplexed about this whole incident . Since the FBI are "self policing " what is stopping them from doctoring and placing info that wasn't there in the first place ? They certainly aren't above setting someone up and could write a book on the subject . As far as I'm concerned , and quite a few other Americans , I lost all faith in them and the entire agency needs to be disbanded - all its employees cannot have another government job and an open investigation on its decisions and leaders needs to be done by a civilian review board .
After the Lois Lerner IRS fiasco with nothing done by Republicans or Democrats , we no longer trust Government agencies .

Red Lily wrote:I just hope that Trump was smart enough to keep the most incriminating documents somewhere other than in a store room at Mar-a-Lago.

Daily Bread wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I just hope that Trump was smart enough to keep the most incriminating documents somewhere other than in a store room at Mar-a-Lago.

He's a step ahead of them . The FBI told Trumps security(all ex CIA because he doesn't trust gov supplied security ) to turn off the cameras  -they turned off the little blinking red lights and the FBI  thought the cameras were off  . They know it and if they prosecute those videos will come out at the appropriate time .  

Red Lily wrote:

Daily Bread wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I just hope that Trump was smart enough to keep the most incriminating documents somewhere other than in a store room at Mar-a-Lago.

He's a step ahead of them . The FBI told Trumps security(all ex CIA because he doesn't trust gov supplied security ) to turn off the cameras  -they turned off the little blinking red lights and the FBI  thought the cameras were off  . They know it and if they prosecute those videos will come out at the appropriate time .  

I hope you're right DB and I really don't think Trump actually is that stupid but, if that's the case, why not bring out the videos now anyway?  The constant threat to indict is damaging in and of itself and swaying people who may otherwise take Trump's side.

Red Lily wrote:

Daily Bread wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I just hope that Trump was smart enough to keep the most incriminating documents somewhere other than in a store room at Mar-a-Lago.

He's a step ahead of them . The FBI told Trumps security(all ex CIA because he doesn't trust gov supplied security ) to turn off the cameras  -they turned off the little blinking red lights and the FBI  thought the cameras were off  . They know it and if they prosecute those videos will come out at the appropriate time .  

I hope you're right DB and I really don't think Trump actually is that stupid but, if that's the case, why not bring out the videos now anyway?  The constant threat to indict is damaging in and of itself and swaying people who may otherwise take Trump's side.

Red Lily wrote:I just hope that Trump was smart enough to keep the most incriminating documents somewhere other than in a store room at Mar-a-Lago.

RV wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I just hope that Trump was smart enough to keep the most incriminating documents somewhere other than in a store room at Mar-a-Lago.

"Most incriminating documents"? Who needs incriminating documents? The FBI has been pursuing President Trump since he first declared that he was running. It doesn't take any "documents" to fake charges, plant evidence or claim that someone is guilty of something. All it takes is a complete lack of ethics and political motivation.