Bad news for Liah Thomas pretend female who is dominating women's swimming

https://nypost.com/2022/06/19/fina-votes-to-restrict-transgender-women-from-swimming-events/

International swimming federation SAYS...Males who have experienced male puberty may not compete in womens' competition.

My happiness to hear that males can no longer swim as women sure was short-lived.
Right up until reading that FINA - whatever that stands for - is bending over backwards to cater to all the "its" wants and needs.  
Bicycling didn't improve matters much.  Ho hum.


There is one thing - at least that "Lea" Thomas got his ass kicked to the curb. For now, anyway.

Give them their own category and they'll lose the spotlight so that's a good thing. It's a start.

In what way is FINA catering to 'it' 2? What did I miss?

Red Lily wrote:Give them their own category and they'll lose the spotlight so that's a good thing.  It's a start.

In what way is FINA catering to 'it' 2?  What did I miss?

By "its," I meant the "its" who are neither he's nor she's.  By 'catering', I was referring to all the time and effort FINA is putting into creating a special category for just that group.
I dunno.  Maybe I'm out of line with my unwillingness to embrace policies attempting to normalize that which is not normal.  I can't accept their behavior, and I don't appreciate any organization making special arrangements for it.

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:Give them their own category and they'll lose the spotlight so that's a good thing.  It's a start.

In what way is FINA catering to 'it' 2?  What did I miss?

By "its," I meant the "its" who are neither he's nor she's.  By 'catering', I was referring to all the time and effort FINA is putting into creating a special category for just that group.
I dunno.  Maybe I'm out of line with my unwillingness to embrace policies attempting to normalize that which is not normal.  I can't accept their behavior.  

My definition of 'it' is the same as yours lolol.

I don't see this decision as embracing policies to normalize the insanity though. I see it as the first step to keep these freaks out of women's sport. I don't care if the freaks have their own category. In my view that's better than allowing them to continue to compete against real women. They won't get the money, be able to steal scholarships from girls and faux 'recognition' in their own category and hopefully they'll just disappear into the ether where they belong.

Gotta start somewhere to end this nonsense once and for all.

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:Give them their own category and they'll lose the spotlight so that's a good thing.  It's a start.

In what way is FINA catering to 'it' 2?  What did I miss?

By "its," I meant the "its" who are neither he's nor she's.  By 'catering', I was referring to all the time and effort FINA is putting into creating a special category for just that group.
I dunno.  Maybe I'm out of line with my unwillingness to embrace policies attempting to normalize that which is not normal.  I can't accept their behavior.  

My definition of 'it' is the same as yours lolol.

I don't see this decision as embracing policies to normalize the insanity though.  I see it as the first step to keep these freaks out of women's sport.  I don't care if the freaks have their own category.  In my view that's better than allowing them to continue to compete against real women.  They won't get the money, be able to steal scholarships from girls and faux 'recognition' in their own category and hopefully they'll just disappear into the ether where they belong.

Gotta start somewhere to end this nonsense once and for all.

 ""I don't care if the freaks have their own category.  ""

Then you'd have the little freaks whining that the larger hairier freaks had an advantage lol

vege57 wrote:

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:Give them their own category and they'll lose the spotlight so that's a good thing.  It's a start.

In what way is FINA catering to 'it' 2?  What did I miss?

By "its," I meant the "its" who are neither he's nor she's.  By 'catering', I was referring to all the time and effort FINA is putting into creating a special category for just that group.
I dunno.  Maybe I'm out of line with my unwillingness to embrace policies attempting to normalize that which is not normal.  I can't accept their behavior.  

My definition of 'it' is the same as yours lolol.

I don't see this decision as embracing policies to normalize the insanity though.  I see it as the first step to keep these freaks out of women's sport.  I don't care if the freaks have their own category.  In my view that's better than allowing them to continue to compete against real women.  They won't get the money, be able to steal scholarships from girls and faux 'recognition' in their own category and hopefully they'll just disappear into the ether where they belong.

Gotta start somewhere to end this nonsense once and for all.

 ""I don't care if the freaks have their own category.  ""

Then you'd have the little freaks whining that the larger hairier freaks had an advantage lol

These smug freaks competing against women in sport absolutely infuriate me as do their supporters!  Their supporters maybe even moreso.  

The left is starting to realize that their circular logic is alienating parts of their base. The Women's movement has been kicked to the curb so trannies can redefine what a woman is and the Women's movement doesn't like it. Blacks are being ignored for the larger hispanic voting block. Union leaders are getting rich as unions are shut down because factories are moving out of the country. The left is guano crazy and they are beginning to pay the price for it.

Red Lily wrote:

2cent wrote:

Red Lily wrote:Give them their own category and they'll lose the spotlight so that's a good thing.  It's a start.

In what way is FINA catering to 'it' 2?  What did I miss?

By "its," I meant the "its" who are neither he's nor she's.  By 'catering', I was referring to all the time and effort FINA is putting into creating a special category for just that group.
I dunno.  Maybe I'm out of line with my unwillingness to embrace policies attempting to normalize that which is not normal.  I can't accept their behavior.  

My definition of 'it' is the same as yours lolol.

I don't see this decision as embracing policies to normalize the insanity though.  I see it as the first step to keep these freaks out of women's sport.  I don't care if the freaks have their own category.  In my view that's better than allowing them to continue to compete against real women.  They won't get the money, be able to steal scholarships from girls and faux 'recognition' in their own category and hopefully they'll just disappear into the ether where they belong.

Gotta start somewhere to end this nonsense once and for all.

Yeah, it's good that these misfits' ability to steal what rightfully belongs to REAL women was cut off.   Where we differ, is that I don't think they should be accommodated at all.  It encourages more of it.

Transgenders would have a difficult life.
A decision has to be made regards their participation in sport.

imho - competing against women is unjust.
There are prob not enough to form their own comp.