Former SEAL Eli Crane: 200 Navy SEALs Will Retire Before Taking Vaxx

vege57 wrote:

HawkTheSlayer wrote:Removed
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/

Rumble is simply YouTube's competition without the "woke" and censorship.

If you don't like the viewpoint, that's your prerogative.
But I'm giving you fair warning about continuing to post false info like this ever time you disagree with an article.

You do this repeatly.
Counter the argument with any link you like that's pertinent or stay silent.
We know exactly where most all sites stand.

We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site.

""We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site""

Maybe you do, You appear to be comfortable with your right leaning members to post this sort of misinformation, which in some jurisdictions could be a criminal offence ?


https://politicalhaven.forumotion.com/t4602-new-zealand-rewarding-doctors-who-agree-to-euthanize-covid-patients[/quote]

There are plenty of these type of threads posted that I don't care for at all.
They are kook threads.

But folks are free to post them and go at it all they want if they stay civil.

If the only argument one has is that another poster's link is invalid because it is left leaning or right leaning, you've lost the battle.
When it becomes a habit, it becomes trolling and baiting.

Posted only to incite a negative response.

If you don't like the kook threads or any other threads, stay out of them. Like me.

vege57 wrote:

HawkTheSlayer wrote:

vege57 wrote:

HawkTheSlayer wrote:Removed
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/

Rumble is simply YouTube's competition without the "woke" and censorship.

If you don't like the viewpoint, that's your prerogative.
But I'm giving you fair warning about continuing to post false info like this ever time you disagree with an article.

You do this repeatly.
Counter the argument with any link you like that's pertinent or stay silent.
We know exactly where most all sites stand.

We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site.

""But I'm giving you fair warning about continuing to post false info like this ever time you disagree with an article.""


Seriously Hawk, Maybe you should take a look at some of Lizzies posts and links, you cant have one without accepting the other, Is this a forum or a fiefdom ?

censorship can be a double edged sword

I already romoved her reply completely .

Be civil. No flamebait.

Its not her comment, its the thread, fake news at best

Im being more than civil ,

More so than your comment " flamebait""  I've not made a personal comment directed at you ?[/quote]

I was referring to Sprint's Flamebait which in turn illicited another nasty response which I had to remove also.

HawkTheSlayer wrote:

vege57 wrote:

HawkTheSlayer wrote:Removed
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/

Rumble is simply YouTube's competition without the "woke" and censorship.

If you don't like the viewpoint, that's your prerogative.
But I'm giving you fair warning about continuing to post false info like this ever time you disagree with an article.

You do this repeatly.
Counter the argument with any link you like that's pertinent or stay silent.
We know exactly where most all sites stand.

We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site.

""We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site""

Maybe you do, You appear to be comfortable with your right leaning members to post this sort of misinformation, which in some jurisdictions could be a criminal offence ?


https://politicalhaven.forumotion.com/t4602-new-zealand-rewarding-doctors-who-agree-to-euthanize-covid-patients

There are plenty of these type of threads posted that I don't care for at all.
They are kook threads.

But folks are free to post them and go at it all they want if they stay civil.

If the only argument one has is that another poster's link is invalid because it is left leaning or right leaning, you've lost the battle.
When it becomes a habit, it becomes trolling and baiting.

Posted only to incite a negative response.

If you don't like the kook threads or any other threads, stay out of them. Like me.
[/quote]


""If you don't like the kook threads or any other threads, stay out of them. Like me.""

Maybe you should take some of your own advice regarding Sprints posts .?

""Posted only to incite a negative response."" Are you a mind reader ?

So you differentiate, between threads and posts you believe are put there to incite a reaction, Not very objective

vege57 wrote:

HawkTheSlayer wrote:

vege57 wrote:

HawkTheSlayer wrote:Removed
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/

Rumble is simply YouTube's competition without the "woke" and censorship.

If you don't like the viewpoint, that's your prerogative.
But I'm giving you fair warning about continuing to post false info like this ever time you disagree with an article.

You do this repeatly.
Counter the argument with any link you like that's pertinent or stay silent.
We know exactly where most all sites stand.

We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site.

""We dont need to be informed by you or a left leaning, fact check site""

Maybe you do, You appear to be comfortable with your right leaning members to post this sort of misinformation, which in some jurisdictions could be a criminal offence ?


https://politicalhaven.forumotion.com/t4602-new-zealand-rewarding-doctors-who-agree-to-euthanize-covid-patients

There are plenty of these type of threads posted that I don't care for at all.
They are kook threads.

But folks are free to post them and go at it all they want if they stay civil.

If the only argument one has is that another poster's link is invalid because it is left leaning or right leaning, you've lost the battle.
When it becomes a habit, it becomes trolling and baiting.

Posted only to incite a negative response.

If you don't like the kook threads or any other threads, stay out of them. Like me.

""If you don't like the kook threads or any other threads, stay out of them. Like me.""

Maybe you should take some of your own advice regarding Sprints posts .?

""Posted only to incite a negative response."" Are you a mind reader ?

[/quote]

It wasn't a post. He had nothing to say except partial quote the link.

It was a link (which I left) he researched, drew a conclusion and decided it was correct.

It was not.

The retaliatory gif was removed along with the post.

I missed all this and didn't see what has been removed but these 'retaliatory' posts and gifs need to be brought under control because sometimes anything that a person considers to be 'not correct' or another disagrees with brings on a swathe of abuse which is very far from civil.

Differences of opinions are fine, we all have them, but abuse is not.

Red Lily wrote:I missed all this and didn't see what has been removed but these 'retaliatory' posts and gifs need to be brought under control because sometimes anything that a person considers to be 'not correct' brings on a swathe of abuse which is very far from civil.

Differences of opinions are fine, we all have them, but abuse is not.

I hope you not accusing me of being abusive ?

vege57 wrote:

Red Lily wrote:I missed all this and didn't see what has been removed but these 'retaliatory' posts and gifs need to be brought under control because sometimes anything that a person considers to be 'not correct' brings on a swathe of abuse which is very far from civil.

Differences of opinions are fine, we all have them, but abuse is not.

I hope you not accusing me of being abusive ?  

No! Not at all.

Im finding the quote option is a little wonky , Or is God messing with me

The real God, not hawk lol

""It was a link (which I left) he researched, drew a conclusion and decided it was correct.""

Surely that's par for the course here, We could analyze every post and arrive at the opinion that people are taking liberties with the facts, But you choose to single Sprint out, i just find that to be a little too convenient