The Unthinkable: Culling the Population To Balance the Books

While the public is told the preconceived COVID-19 pandemic is a calamity of unfolding proportion, that emanates from a deadly mutated virus that appears to have been “invented” in a laboratory and targets octogenarians in particular, and the proposed antidote is mandated vaccination that may have more heinous consequences than the virus itself, there is another faction that sees this catastrophe differently. Those who know what this pandemic is really all about – insurance actuaries.

It’s about balancing the accounting books. It is why progressive globalists tell us we need a reset – a financial reset. It’s really all about private bankers and life insurance companies and public pension planners having to balance their accounting books. They have to clear their ledgers of people. Americans are living too long. The pools of insurance money are exhausted. The pandemic serves as a distraction. The virus will take the blame for the planned deaths.

There is a thought in the back of many skeptical Americans’ minds that our overlords are attempting to cull the population. The US Debt Clock lists unfunded liabilities of $21+ trillion for Social Security and another $32+ trillion of unfunded liabilities for Medicare. The entire US economy (gross domestic product) in a year could not balance these accounts.

A manufactured pandemic

If you don’t believe the pandemic has been manufactured, examine the chart below. It reveals wide differences in the frequency of tests, variance in percent of positive tests (rigging the PCR nasal swab test) to come up with lots of cases (many which they said were asymptomatic!), to produce contrived case-to-fatality rates (people were dying, but not necessarily of COVID). The pandemic seems to worsen along political lines in the US.

Are we expected to believe from 1% to 28% of COVID-19 PCR tests were positive; cases per 100,000 varied by 48-fold and deaths by almost 14-fold? (see chart below)



Balancing the accounting books

To deal with impending insolvency social planners and government overlords discuss alternatives: (a) cut back on services (ration delivery of healthcare and trim pension checks); (b) increase taxes and insurance premiums; (c) delay enrollment in these programs; (d) or the unthinkable, the unmentionable, via neglect or by intention, increase the premature die-off of retirees to save these programs from insolvency.

The idea of culling human populations is not new

Don’t think the idea of covert euthanasia to solve shortfalls in public funding is far-fetched. I pointed out in 2013, Great Britain could not afford to care for all of its retirees and simply resorted to dehydrating its institutionalized retirees (murder without fingerprints) to remove them from being such a financial burden.

The biggest Ponzi scheme of all

Medicare and Social Security turn out to be Ponzi schemes – the first ones in get all the rewards as the last ones in pay for those who enrolled early into the program. Upon his retirement as chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank in 2004, Alan Greenspan asked “When are we going to tell the public we can’t afford Medicare and Social Security?”

Die on time

One rationale for engineering lifespan so people die on time is that 13-25% of healthcare costs occur in the last six months of life. Eliminate these fragile, aged, infirm, vulnerable, feeble-minded people and you have fixed your accounting books. Most of the people (99.74%) dying of COVID-19 in the U.S. were institutionalized. The virus targeted the frail elderly in nursing homes.

Lost years of life = Social Security & Medicare savings

As of October 2020 researchers estimate 2.5 million years of life may have been lost due to COVID-19 in the United States. (For reference, as of January, 2021 the years of life lost worldwide (81 countries) was estimated at 20.5 million years globally. Source: Scientific Reports Feb 18, 2021)

While that 2.5 million lost years of life number may be in dispute because of bogus PCR tests that are used to confirm cause of death, that figure can be calculated as life insurance actuaries do to come up with a guesstimation.

The average monthly Social Security today is $1543/month. These premature deaths would save $46,290,000,000 ($46.29 billion) if all of the deaths were among retirees who receive pension checks ($1543 x 12 X 2,500,000 = $46.9 billion)

The Trustees of the Old Age Survivors & Disability Insurance (OASDI or Social Security) Trust Fund “now project the OASDI annual cost will exceed total income beginning in 2021.” Only partial payments 73-79% would be possible looking forward. (Source: Bipartisan Policy Center Oct. 2020)

From an insurance actuary’s viewpoint

Here is how Social Security actuaries view the problem. The pandemic is likely to increase unemployment and reduce payroll deductions which serve as revenue to the Social Security OASDI Trust Fund. Under one scenario insurance actuaries plotted that 362,000 older Americans would prematurely succumb to the COVID-19 virus. That is out of an estimated 1.4 million aged Americans that reside in nursing homes.

The actuaries refer to this population of institutionalized Americans as “older people who would have died from other causes over the next several years.” In other words, they were going to die soon anyway. These premature deaths, induced by the virus (or maybe even the vaccines) would represent ~25% of the nursing home population in the US.

“However, unlike in most economic recessions, the potential effects from increased Social Security benefit applications will be partially offset by increased deaths among our beneficiaries due to the pandemic.”

—Social Security Administration Chief Actuary Stephen Goss told Congress today. Source: FORBES MAGAZINE 2020



continued:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/06/no_author/the-unthinkable-culling-the-population-to-balance-the-books/

Government seems to offer no examples --zero -- of anything but greed.  

So then along comes Trump, and what do they do? Take him out behind the shed and beat the daylights out of him.

Talk about the wrong move.

Destroy democrats and their party.

Entire curriculums in higher education are based on careers in government avarice.

Personally, I believe there is much truth in the article.