Why all old conspiracy theories are false

It's obvious.

After that is acknowledged, every old conspiracy theory is damaging at best

Sprintcyclist wrote:It's obvious.

After that is acknowledged, every old conspiracy theory is damaging at best

So, "conspiracy theories" are false because you say so?

Who murdered JFK?

Here's another one that proved to be a 'conspiracy' reality.

https://thelibertydaily.com/shocking-connection-now-confirmed-between-autism-covid-vaccines/

Sprint is always talking about "conspiracy theories". This is a political site, so I don't know what kind of site he thinks he's on.

Who decides what is a "conspiracy theory" anyway? Anything could be considered a "conspiracy theory". All it takes is one person to be close-minded enough not to look into it.

Keith wrote:Sprint is always talking about "conspiracy theories". This is a political site, so I don't know what kind of site he thinks he's on.

Who decides what is a "conspiracy theory" anyway? Anything could be considered a "conspiracy theory". All it takes is one person to be close-minded enough not to look into it.

you're safer if you go along with government propaganda....until you aren't.

Calypso Jones wrote:

Keith wrote:Sprint is always talking about "conspiracy theories". This is a political site, so I don't know what kind of site he thinks he's on.

Who decides what is a "conspiracy theory" anyway? Anything could be considered a "conspiracy theory". All it takes is one person to be close-minded enough not to look into it.

you're safer if you go along with government propaganda....until you aren't.

True. For some people (such as Sprint, apparently), it's easier to believe what the government tells you than to think for yourself and do your own research. I guess they're afraid that the truth would make them too uncomfortable.

First off, who defines what "Old" is? What age does a fact have to be to be classified as "Old"? Is the theory of evolution, old? What is the time period for "old"? Is it "old" after a week? A month? 6 months? A year? A decade?

Secondly, who defines what is a fact versus what is a "conspiracy theory"? Just because some liberal calls something a "conspiracy theory" does not mean that it is either a "conspiracy" nor a "theory".

Democrats call a lot of things a "conspiracy theory" which in fact are not "conspiracies" nor "theories" at all. So, just because someone labels a topic something does not mean that they have a shred of credibility, evidence nor information/experience about nor with it. Adam Schiff for example claimed to have "absolute proof" of President Trump's supposed connection with and payouts as a Russian spy, which never materialized and were proven later as completely false statements made for political reasons.

https://www.theorganicprepper.com/covid-conspiracy-fact/
Vindication is sweet