George Floyd Juror Claims Jury Duty Is A Means To “Spark Some Change”...What Else Do We Know About His Impartiality and Activism?

Brandon Mitchell is known as Juror #52 in the trial of police officer Derek Chauvin for the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota last spring.

When he was chosen as a juror, he claimed to be impartial. In fact, according to The Post Milennial, Brandon insisted that he “had no prior knowledge of the George Floyd civil case” according to FOX9.

According to Minneapolis’ FOX 9 reporter Paul Blume, who livetweeted the case on March 15, “Judge Cahill asked Juror #52, whether he heard anything about the #GeorgeFloyd civil case. He says, no. He explained hearing some basic info about trial dates, etc from the news in recent months, but nothing that would keep him from serving as impartial juror. #ChauvinTrial”
“Juror #52 wrote in his jury questionnaire that he wondered why other police officers at the scene did not intervene in #GeorgeFloyd deadly arrest. He recognizes the historic nature of the case. Defense says he is an acceptable juror. So state’s turn to question,” Blume added.


continued:
https://100percentfedup.com/george-floyd-juror-claims-jury-duty-is-a-means-to-spark-some-change-what-else-do-we-know-about-his-impartiality-and-activism/

Looks like additional proof why there should be another trial in another venue...