It Is My body?

I was listening to Dennis Prager this morning on my way to the men's breakfast at church. Dennis asked the question about how is it "my body" as Democrats are known to claim when talking about killing the unborn but, when talking about the "vaccine" suddenly it isn't "my body" any longer. Suddenly, Democrats have no problem dictating what you can and cannot do with "your body" regarding the "vaccine". Is this another double standard? Do Democrats see the hypocrisy? Is the hypocrisy deliberate? Intentional?

If the "vaccine" is "safe" and "effective", why would one need a mask? What is the point to "vaccination" if one can contract and spread the virus regardless of whether they have the "vaccine" or not? If one mask is not effective in preventing the spread of the virus, what is the point in wearing two or three? Four? A dozen? If the numbers are correct, why is there no longer any flu, colds, Cancer, Heart Disease, Strokes, transportation accidents, Diabetes, etc.? Why aren't the number of deaths from all these other sources not also publicized?

It has all been a lie. It has always been a lie and they carve out that lie to fit whatever they need it to be about or cover.

Jen, love, love, LOVE the kitty picture By the way!

Good point @RV. It occurs to me also...all these nurses wearing their mask, THEY SAID, for the MANY MANY CHILDREN who are sick and have died from covid...now we know there were very very few. IF the medical profession had wanted to end the abomination of abortion they could have donned a mask and possibly made a dent...but they didn't...and why not.

Where's the mask for the thousands of Dead babies aborted in this country alone on a daily basis. WHERE"S YER DAMN MASK FER THAT!!??

STILL very glad that i am not a victim of gov't propaganda.

Apparently it is not your body where tattoos are concerned.

Sprintcyclist wrote:Apparently it is not your body where tattoos are concerned.

Really? So one cannot pay for a tattoo if one wants to? I would need some data and facts to back up this claim because I see (stupid), people with lots of tattoos all the time.

RV wrote:

Sprintcyclist wrote:Apparently it is not your body where tattoos are concerned.

Really? So one cannot pay for a tattoo if one wants to? I would need some data and facts to back up this claim because I see (stupid), people with lots of tattoos all the time.

I see lots of stupid people without tattoos all the time too.