Supreme Court refuses to block emergency bid to stock student loan bailout Breaking
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Supreme Court refuses to block emergency bid to stock student loan bailout Breaking
BREAKING STORY
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a request to block the Biden administration’s student loan bailout. Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied the emergency application to block the program, which had been filed by a Wisconsin taxpayers’ group on Wednesday. Barrett is responsible for such applications issued from cases in the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which includes Wisconsin. A notation of her denial on the Supreme Court’s docket does not indicate that she referred the application to the entire Supreme Court before she rejected the request.
The loan relief plan, which is set to begin taking effect this weekend, will cancel up to $20,000 in student debt for millions of borrowers. More than 8 million individuals submitted applications for the program last weekend after the U.S. Department of Education launched a beta test.
The challenge to the plan came from the Brown County Taxpayers Association in Wisconsin, which had filed a federal lawsuit in that state as part of that effort. Earlier this month, a U.S. District Court judge dismissed the suit, saying the group lacked legal standing to stall the plan pending the outcome of the case.
Dan Lennington, deputy counsel of Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, Inc., which acted as lawyers for the taxpapers’ group, in a statement said, “Of course, we are disappointed that the court denied us emergency relief.”
“But that does not make the program lawful,” Lennington said. “Student loan forgiveness will remain under review by the courts and could possibly still be paused as we advocated for this wee....
The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a request to block the Biden administration’s student loan bailout. Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied the emergency application to block the program, which had been filed by a Wisconsin taxpayers’ group on Wednesday. Barrett is responsible for such applications issued from cases in the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, which includes Wisconsin. A notation of her denial on the Supreme Court’s docket does not indicate that she referred the application to the entire Supreme Court before she rejected the request.
The loan relief plan, which is set to begin taking effect this weekend, will cancel up to $20,000 in student debt for millions of borrowers. More than 8 million individuals submitted applications for the program last weekend after the U.S. Department of Education launched a beta test.
The challenge to the plan came from the Brown County Taxpayers Association in Wisconsin, which had filed a federal lawsuit in that state as part of that effort. Earlier this month, a U.S. District Court judge dismissed the suit, saying the group lacked legal standing to stall the plan pending the outcome of the case.
Dan Lennington, deputy counsel of Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, Inc., which acted as lawyers for the taxpapers’ group, in a statement said, “Of course, we are disappointed that the court denied us emergency relief.”
“But that does not make the program lawful,” Lennington said. “Student loan forgiveness will remain under review by the courts and could possibly still be paused as we advocated for this wee....
Calypso Jones- Posts : 28659
Points : 38663
Reputation : 570
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 24
Re: Supreme Court refuses to block emergency bid to stock student loan bailout Breaking
Coney Barrett explains it to us numbskulls.
As Amy Howe explained, the Supreme Court did not consider the merits of the case. It was a procedural decision based on ‘lack of standing to file suit.’ The Bailout case is still being decided by the 7th Circuit and could ultimately end up before the Supreme Court again, after the 7th issues its decision.
As Amy Howe explained, the Supreme Court did not consider the merits of the case. It was a procedural decision based on ‘lack of standing to file suit.’ The Bailout case is still being decided by the 7th Circuit and could ultimately end up before the Supreme Court again, after the 7th issues its decision.
Calypso Jones- Posts : 28659
Points : 38663
Reputation : 570
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 24
Re: Supreme Court refuses to block emergency bid to stock student loan bailout Breaking
Eleventh Circuit denied Lindseyrella Grahamnesty the right to ignore a subpeona from the J6 unselect committee bores.
Now don't think for a minute that he wouldn't love to stick a knife in DJT's back. HE WOULD. He just wants us all to think he is testifying agin his will.
A federal appeals court on Thursday afternoon rejected a request by Sen. Lindsey Graham to block a subpoena for his testimony before a Georgia grand jury investigating President Donald Trump for election interference.
Graham, R-S.C., had asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to stay an order compelling his testimony issued by a federal district judge in Georgia pending his appeal of that decision. “Senator Graham has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his appeal,” the 11th Circuit said in its ruling Thursday.
story still developing.
Now don't think for a minute that he wouldn't love to stick a knife in DJT's back. HE WOULD. He just wants us all to think he is testifying agin his will.
A federal appeals court on Thursday afternoon rejected a request by Sen. Lindsey Graham to block a subpoena for his testimony before a Georgia grand jury investigating President Donald Trump for election interference.
Graham, R-S.C., had asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to stay an order compelling his testimony issued by a federal district judge in Georgia pending his appeal of that decision. “Senator Graham has failed to demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his appeal,” the 11th Circuit said in its ruling Thursday.
story still developing.
Calypso Jones- Posts : 28659
Points : 38663
Reputation : 570
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 24
Re: Supreme Court refuses to block emergency bid to stock student loan bailout Breaking
I can't say I'm surprised by SCOTUS's lack of nads. After all, they backed away from the whole election fraud case so I would expect them to back away from this as well.
There are television Ads claiming that Democrats know how hard hit American families are with inflation and all. What are the Democrats solutions? Spend more money, increase the debt, raise taxes, hire more armed IRS agents, put more criminals back on the streets to victimize innocent Americans, defund law enforcement, make sure that the military is "woke" and allow millions of illegals to invade America. Yeah, sounds like a plan...
There are television Ads claiming that Democrats know how hard hit American families are with inflation and all. What are the Democrats solutions? Spend more money, increase the debt, raise taxes, hire more armed IRS agents, put more criminals back on the streets to victimize innocent Americans, defund law enforcement, make sure that the military is "woke" and allow millions of illegals to invade America. Yeah, sounds like a plan...
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum