WSJ fails its readership on the whole lockdown scamdemic issue
2 posters
WSJ fails its readership on the whole lockdown scamdemic issue
by Calypso Jones Wed Aug 24, 2022 1:57 pm
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/wall-street-journal-wsj-covid-policies/
Now that our public health agencies’ leaders have admitted failure when it comes to their COVID-19 policies, the Wall Street Journal suddenly has the “courage” to offer a stiff critique.
Now that our public health agencies’ leaders have admitted failure when it comes to their COVID-19 policies, the Wall Street Journal suddenly has the “courage” to offer a stiff critique.
Calypso Jones- Posts : 23855
Points : 32663
Reputation : 506
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 23
HawkTheSlayer, 2cent and Lummy like this post
Re: WSJ fails its readership on the whole lockdown scamdemic issue
by Calypso Jones Wed Aug 24, 2022 2:01 pm
Tierney also dropped a series of “truth bombs,” including:
“Their oppressive measures were taken against the longstanding advice of public-health experts, who warned that they would lead to catastrophe and were proved right.”
“For all the talk from officials like Dr. Fauci about following ‘the science,’ these leaders ignored decades of research — as well as fresh data from the pandemic — when they set strict Covid regulations.”
“The burden of proof was on them to justify their dangerous experiment, yet they failed to conduct rigorous analyses, preferring to tout badly flawed studies while refusing to confront obvious evidence of the policies’ failure.”
“U.S. states with more-restrictive policies fared no better, on average, than states with less-restrictive policies.”
“When case rates throughout the pandemic are plotted on a graph, the trajectory in states with mask mandates is virtually identical to the trajectory in states without mandates. (The states without mandates actually had slightly fewer COVID deaths per capita.)”
A Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of studies around the world concluded that lockdown and mask restrictions have had “little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.”
Florida’s and Sweden’s open policies have been vindicated based upon their lower levels of excess mortality compared to other regions.
“It was bad enough that Fauci, the CDC and the World Health Organization ignored the best scientific advice at the start of this pandemic. It’s sociopathic for them to promote a worse catastrophe for future outbreaks.”
I take no issue with Tierney’s list. The problem here is with the Wall Street Journal.
Every single point this opinion piece offered could — and should — have been made months or years ago.
There was longstanding advice from public health experts that predicted Fauci and Walensky’s failures? Why didn’t you say so in 2020?
Fauci and Walensky ignored decades of research? They touted flawed studies while ignoring the obvious failures unfolding in front of them, month after month?
The successes of Sweden and Florida were apparent in 2020.
Where were the articles in your publication that could have brought light to these issues over the last two years?
!!!!!!
what? are we supposed to just forget all about WSJ failure too, turn the page and TRUST THEM AGAIN??? don't THINK so.
“Their oppressive measures were taken against the longstanding advice of public-health experts, who warned that they would lead to catastrophe and were proved right.”
“For all the talk from officials like Dr. Fauci about following ‘the science,’ these leaders ignored decades of research — as well as fresh data from the pandemic — when they set strict Covid regulations.”
“The burden of proof was on them to justify their dangerous experiment, yet they failed to conduct rigorous analyses, preferring to tout badly flawed studies while refusing to confront obvious evidence of the policies’ failure.”
“U.S. states with more-restrictive policies fared no better, on average, than states with less-restrictive policies.”
“When case rates throughout the pandemic are plotted on a graph, the trajectory in states with mask mandates is virtually identical to the trajectory in states without mandates. (The states without mandates actually had slightly fewer COVID deaths per capita.)”
A Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of studies around the world concluded that lockdown and mask restrictions have had “little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.”
Florida’s and Sweden’s open policies have been vindicated based upon their lower levels of excess mortality compared to other regions.
“It was bad enough that Fauci, the CDC and the World Health Organization ignored the best scientific advice at the start of this pandemic. It’s sociopathic for them to promote a worse catastrophe for future outbreaks.”
I take no issue with Tierney’s list. The problem here is with the Wall Street Journal.
Every single point this opinion piece offered could — and should — have been made months or years ago.
There was longstanding advice from public health experts that predicted Fauci and Walensky’s failures? Why didn’t you say so in 2020?
Fauci and Walensky ignored decades of research? They touted flawed studies while ignoring the obvious failures unfolding in front of them, month after month?
The successes of Sweden and Florida were apparent in 2020.
Where were the articles in your publication that could have brought light to these issues over the last two years?
!!!!!!
what? are we supposed to just forget all about WSJ failure too, turn the page and TRUST THEM AGAIN??? don't THINK so.
Calypso Jones- Posts : 23855
Points : 32663
Reputation : 506
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 23
HawkTheSlayer and 2cent like this post
Re: WSJ fails its readership on the whole lockdown scamdemic issue
by 2cent Fri Aug 26, 2022 1:54 pm
EXcellent article. Bravo to Madhavy Setty, MDCalypso Jones wrote:https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/wall-street-journal-wsj-covid-policies/
Now that our public health agencies’ leaders have admitted failure when it comes to their COVID-19 policies, the Wall Street Journal suddenly has the “courage” to offer a stiff critique.
From said article:
You had ample opportunity to give voice to the dissenters who were pleading for a voice, a conversation and a debate based on the very same evidence you are mentioning now.
You failed your readership. You failed the public.
The CDC’s policies were so devastating because you did not challenge them. Not once.
As a media platform, you were no less negligent than the public health officials you see fit to denigrate now — after untold damage has occurred, at their hands and yours.
Perhaps you’ve caused your loyal readers to finally scratch their heads and reconsider their perspective after 28 months of mercilessly attacking those of us who were asking you and other mainstream platforms to do your job.
Why are you holding Fauci and Walensky accountable now? Is it because they are finally admitting they blew it?
They are not the only galactically incompetent parties in this global tragedy. You are, too
Not much to add, except to urge all to read it.
2cent- Posts : 8320
Points : 10181
Reputation : 387
Join date : 2021-02-28
HawkTheSlayer likes this post
Re: WSJ fails its readership on the whole lockdown scamdemic issue
by Calypso Jones Wed Apr 10, 2024 12:31 pm
https://rumble.com/v4ok213-first-26-days-of-the-plandemic-show-it-was-clearly-premeditated.html
Premeditated Scamdemic.
Premeditated Scamdemic.
Calypso Jones- Posts : 23855
Points : 32663
Reputation : 506
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 23
HawkTheSlayer likes this post
Sponsored content
Similar topics» How A Service Dog Fails Out Of School
» Dem Rep profitted from investments during Scamdemic
» 10 Biggest Wheel of Fortune Fails
» They tried to pull this Scamdemic hoax in 1976, didn't work
» CPS fails again, children pay the price with their lives
» Dem Rep profitted from investments during Scamdemic
» 10 Biggest Wheel of Fortune Fails
» They tried to pull this Scamdemic hoax in 1976, didn't work
» CPS fails again, children pay the price with their lives
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum