REALITY CHECK: Triple-injected 500% more likely to “catch” covid compared to the unvaccinated & Pfizer’s mRNA injections are nowhere near 95 percent effective: Where did the company come up with this figure?

Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” effectiveness continues to drop, especially among the triple injected who are now up to five times more likely to become infected with the disease than the unvaccinated.

The latest figures from the UK Health Security Agency show that covid jab effectiveness has dropped to minus-391 percent among triple-jabbed people aged 60-69. For those aged 30-59, covid jab effectiveness is between minus-298 percent and minus-324 percent.

All other age groups saw similar drops in jab effectiveness, the conclusion being that fully jabbed people are somewhere between three and five times more likely than the unvaccinated to test “positive” for the Fauci Flu. (Related: Deaths are skyrocketing in the fully injected.)

Currently, “cases” of the Wuhan Disease are the highest they have been since at least the beginning of the year, the data shows. It is clear from the figures that not only do the jabs not protect against infection, but they actually appear to cause more of it.

“The figures show that the case-rates are highest among the triple vaccinated in all age groups,” reports the Daily Exposé (UK). “But not just by a little bit, instead by a million miles. And the gap between the unvaccinated and triple vaccinated has been getting worse by the month.”

“Therefore, these figures indicate the Covid-19 injections make recipients more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population.”

continued:
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2022/04/28/reality-check-triple-injected-500-more-likely-to-catch-covid-compared-to-the-unvaccinated/

Where did the company come up with this figure?
Probably from the land of reality.

You might have heard of it.
Has a region called 'trumpLOST'.

Effectiveness of a medicine has NO correlation to political assertions.

Unless, of course, the asserter is a Woketard and for that person, it's ALL ABOUT PARROTING THE NARRATIVE.

You can continue to deny reality, but no one is fooled. Only NPC Woketards feel the need to babble untruths, to show each other they're Right-Thinking.

Casey Jones wrote:Effectiveness of a medicine has NO correlation to political assertions.

Unless, of course, the asserter is a Woketard and for that person, it's ALL ABOUT PARROTING THE NARRATIVE.

You can continue to deny reality, but no one is fooled.  Only NPC Woketards feel the need to babble untruths, to show each other they're Right-Thinking.

You know you love me.
It's ok, I feel your shyness.

"95%", 97% or 100%, who cares when the percentages are all made up anyway? If people think the "Vaccine" is effective and safe then they are more likely to submit to the "Vaccine". If the actual truth was communicated, no one would get the "Vaccine" and then where would the profits be?

Sprintcyclist wrote:Where did the company come up with this figure?
Probably from the land of reality.

You might have heard of it.
Has a region called 'trumpLOST'.

Make an EFFORT to educate yourself. clearly you didn't even bother to read it (no surprise).
You would have seen the sources listed at the bottom, but of course, that would require you
to CLICK again, to see the charts and other info included.

Elizabeth Theus wrote:

Sprintcyclist wrote:Where did the company come up with this figure?
Probably from the land of reality.

You might have heard of it.
Has a region called 'trumpLOST'.

Make an EFFORT to educate yourself.  clearly you didn't even bother to read it (no surprise).
You would have seen the sources listed at the bottom, but of course, that would require you
to CLICK again, to see the charts and other info included.

Lol, you mean he'll have to put down his phone? You mean he won't be able to take a selfie? You mean he'll actually have to expend energy? You mean he'll have to work? Study? Read? Pay attention to something that isn't on a screen?