A Repeal Of The 1967 Reedy Creek Act Could Spell Disaster For Disney World

Disney is a company with a long history of allegations relating to subliminal messaging in children.

More specifically, sexual subliminal messaging. It matters not whether that subliminal messaging is heterosexual or homosexual—small children should not be exposed to those ideas.

Many concerned parents feel this way, and while the increasingly woke agenda may be the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back it isn’t the sole reason this company is facing heat.

Like I said, this company has a long history of being hit with these allegations, and in the past they were expressly heterosexual subliminal messages, or sexual imagery with no explicit sexual orientation.

A big part of the reason the media conglomerate feels all too comfortable in its own skin, and feels like it can regularly push this messaging out while facing little to no criticism stems from the fact that they are treated in a special way legally.

Walt Disney World in Florida is subject to its own governance, it has its own police force, EMS, and building codes not subject to the surrounding county’s laws due to the Reedy Creek Improvement Act passed in 1967.

Disney World is in effect its own country with special privileges, and such power seems to have gone to the heads of those controlling a company that has become almost as powerful and pervasive as the military industrial complex.

continued:
https://welovetrump.com/2022/04/01/a-repeal-of-the-1967-reedy-creek-act-could-spell-disaster-for-disney-world/

HUH! I never heard of the 1967 Reedy Creek Act before. Does this ONLY apply to Disney World, or is this applicable to other recreation sites?

What can I say, there will be life after Disney world lol

My winky will obey.

Disney strangely silent now aren't they.

https://www.wnd.com/2022/10/disney-now-trying-limit-damage-woke-lgbt-activism/

Elizabeth Theus wrote:HUH!  I never heard of the 1967 Reedy Creek Act before.  Does this ONLY apply to Disney World, or is this applicable to other recreation sites?

Disney ONLY received special treatment. the other theme parks dd not. That was not fair. DeSantis has changed that NOW

https://floridianpress.com/2023/02/desantis-ends-disney-the-corporate-kingdom/

DeSamtis ends Disney's Corporate Kingdom. I wonder if there is any regerts on the part of the Disney Elites about putting themselves in the middle of what was NOT their business. Seems there's a lesson there for us and presidebt Bidem's involvememt with Ukraine.

Calypso Jones wrote:

Elizabeth Theus wrote:HUH!  I never heard of the 1967 Reedy Creek Act before.  Does this ONLY apply to Disney World, or is this applicable to other recreation sites?

Disney ONLY received special treatment.  the other theme parks dd not.  That was not fair.  DeSantis has changed that NOW

I wonder how much that "special treatment" cost? Who benefitted?

Disney benefitted, florida taxpayers did not benefit at all. actually it hurt them. and then the double standard for disney and other entertainment parks.