Wikipedia still getting flack for "bias".

I keep hearing about Wikipedia bias. I haven't seen any. Somebody tell me or show me how and where they're biased because by and large I don't think they are.

Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but if the edit is biased, someone else will correct it. See how that works? I don't understand how Wikipedia is biased.

Please give me some examples. Thank you.

Lummy

It'ld be expected some articles in there do have a bias to them.
There are SO many articles in there.
Wiki is the 5th most visited site (or thereabouts), they would be careful that there is NO bias over the site.
If the Wiki reputation is degraded, the business will be negatively affected.

Reputations are very important to companies. Businesses do a LOT to build and protect their name.

nope. wiki is where i learned positively that Soros was in the 8th SS. try re-editting it Lummy.

jirqoadai wrote:nope. wiki is where i learned positively that Soros was in the 8th SS. try re-editting it Lummy.

Do you have a link for that ?

Sprintcyclist wrote:

jirqoadai wrote:nope. wiki is where i learned positively that Soros was in the 8th SS. try re-editting it Lummy.

Do you have a link for that ?

do you have a link that shows his tribe was NOT carried over the danube in a goods truck so it could hide in pest till the soviets ocuppied it? how does thirty jews all survive in buda when the soviets surround the city?

wiki is biased. just read it yourself. forcryinoutloud.

Is Wikipedia Biased? | AllSides
https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased
AllSides uses Wikipedia frequently as a source on our balanced topics pages, and it is the 13th most popular website in the world, so Wikipedia’s bias is worth discussing. Sanger has accused Wikipedia of bias, and some have noted the site’s entries related to communism and socialism fail to mention the crimes and genocides committed under ...
EXPOSED: Wikipedia’s Bias Tested and PROVEN! - Louder With ...
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/wikipedia-bias-proved
Wikipedia is the #1 research tool in the world, boasting over 18 billion views per month. It also pushes a radical left-wing agenda. Crowder and crew expose how they do it. EXPOSED: Wikipedia’s Bias Tested and PROVEN! | Louder with Crowder youtu.be No one is saying Wikipedia should be used as a source to write your next term paper. In fact, if y
5 Studies Call Out Liberal Bias of Wikipedia | Newsmax.com
https://www.newsmax.com/us/wikipedia-liberal-activist-website/2020/11/29/id/999156
Left-wing media bias has taken over once-neutral Wikipedia, just as co-founder Larry Sanger lamented earlier this year, according to five studies reviewing the content of the online encyclopedia.. The studies, originally reported in Breitbart, have concluded Wikipedia is even more left-biased than the Encyclopedia Britannica, left-wing indoctrination is pushed harder by leftist editors ...
Wikipedia Is Badly Biased – Larry Sanger Blog
https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikip
The bias that is rampant on Wikipedia is with the political topics and it runs the gamut from immigration, terrorism, climate change, religion, Islamic extremism, and of course, Trump/Obama/Hillary etc. etc. etc. Comparing how Fox News is covered vs CNN is like night and day. Same with how Obama is deemed nearly a demi-god while Trump has every ...
Wikipedia - Media Bias/Fact Check
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia
Bias. Volunteers edit Wikipedia content rather than the Wikimedia Foundation. Although Wikipedia is edited essentially by anyone, a 2005 study published in the Journal Nature showed that they were just as accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica when it comes to scientific information. In another study completed in 2014 by the Public Library of Science, they compared Wikipedia’s accuracy on ...

We know that it and most all media is trying to present its message under camouflage . Its been that way for a while so we don't take their word verbatum. Everyone puts a slant to their message ,except me !
Every registered Democrat is the enemy and anti American - hunt them down and give them their last rites .

Calypso Jones wrote:Is Wikipedia Biased? | AllSides
https://www.allsides.com/blog/wikipedia-biased
AllSides uses Wikipedia frequently as a source on our balanced topics pages, and it is the 13th most popular website in the world, so Wikipedia’s bias is worth discussing. Sanger has accused Wikipedia of bias, and some have noted the site’s entries related to communism and socialism fail to mention the crimes and genocides committed under ...
EXPOSED: Wikipedia’s Bias Tested and PROVEN! - Louder With ...
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/wikipedia-bias-proved
Wikipedia is the #1 research tool in the world, boasting over 18 billion views per month. It also pushes a radical left-wing agenda. Crowder and crew expose how they do it. EXPOSED: Wikipedia’s Bias Tested and PROVEN! | Louder with Crowder youtu.be No one is saying Wikipedia should be used as a source to write your next term paper. In fact, if y
5 Studies Call Out Liberal Bias of Wikipedia | Newsmax.com
https://www.newsmax.com/us/wikipedia-liberal-activist-website/2020/11/29/id/999156
Left-wing media bias has taken over once-neutral Wikipedia, just as co-founder Larry Sanger lamented earlier this year, according to five studies reviewing the content of the online encyclopedia.. The studies, originally reported in Breitbart, have concluded Wikipedia is even more left-biased than the Encyclopedia Britannica, left-wing indoctrination is pushed harder by leftist editors ...
Wikipedia Is Badly Biased – Larry Sanger Blog
https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikip
The bias that is rampant on Wikipedia is with the political topics and it runs the gamut from immigration, terrorism, climate change, religion, Islamic extremism, and of course, Trump/Obama/Hillary etc. etc. etc. Comparing how Fox News is covered vs CNN is like night and day. Same with how Obama is deemed nearly a demi-god while Trump has every ...
Wikipedia - Media Bias/Fact Check
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wikipedia
Bias. Volunteers edit Wikipedia content rather than the Wikimedia Foundation. Although Wikipedia is edited essentially by anyone, a 2005 study published in the Journal Nature showed that they were just as accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica when it comes to scientific information. In another study completed in 2014 by the Public Library of Science, they compared Wikipedia’s accuracy on ...

No, I have clicked through your links. You have dug deep and found zero.
Most give no links, no testing, just opinions. Some links go nowhere.
One link goes here ..........

............ Slanted Wikipedia articles tend to become less biased than Britannica articles on the same topic as they become substantially revised, .............

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Do-Experts-or-Collective-Intelligence-Write-with-Greenstein-Zhu/8e54d5cf6efc4fd14808134ca8c2ea83fa767919?p2df

hahahah - one of the links .......

........... editors favoring right-leaning views were six times more likely to be sanctioned than those favoring left-leaning views. ..........

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/29/analysis-conservative-wikipedia-editors-six-times-more-likely-to-face-sanctions-than-leftists/

From one of the worlds worst sites.
Right wing views are 'reportedly' sanctioned more often because they are wrong more often.
They are more extreme and dangerous. They ignore modern Medicine/Science or the Legal system of America.