When Anyone Says “Follow the Science” About the COVID-19 Jabs, Show Them This Lancet Study

The Lancet is among the world’s oldest, well-respected medical journals.

Read About The Lancet here:

The Lancet
is an independent, international weekly general medical journal founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley. Since its first issue (October 5, 1823), the journal has strived to make science widely available so that medicine can serve, and transform society, and positively impact the lives of people.

The Lancet
is committed to applying scientific knowledge to improve health and advance human progress. In our weekly issues, and online first content, we publish some of the best science from the best scientists worldwide, providing an unparalleled global reach and impact on health.

The Lancet
has grown from a 19th century pamphlet to a high impact, international journal.

The Lancet
is proud to have published papers that have made a crucial contribution to science and human health. View a selection of our research landmarks from more than 10 000 published issues.

A recent publication in THE LANCET obliterates that narrative that the COVID-19 jabs are safe and effective.

On November 19th, the journal published a study titled, “The epidemiological relevance of the COVID-19-vaccinated population is increasing.”

The study analyzed data from the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, and the United States to determine the epidemiological relevance of vaccinated individuals.

While the experts believed high COVID-19 injection rates would reduce transmission, the latest data indicates that’s clearly not the case.

Find out why below:

Follow on Telegram @WeLoveTrumpNoah











Read the study’s findings at THE LANCET Regional Health Europe:

High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [[1]]. In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older [[2]]. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission. A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) [[3]]. One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more. In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease [[4]]. The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties [[5]]. Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.

Who really follows the science?


https://welovetrump.com/2021/11/29/when-anyone-says-follow-the-science-about-the-covid-19-jabs-show-them-this-lancet-study/?utm_source=newsletter_randy&utm_medium=mixed&utm_campaign=newsletter_randy

This is why no politician or chief medical officer in Australia has ever said..."Of the 1000 positive cases of wu flu reported today X were jabbed fully, Y
had one jab and Z had no jabs...."
The data has never ever been released to the sheep.....

Perhaps we should also follow the science of the CEO of Moderna who has just
announced that the jabs are ineffective against the new o my a con strain...
Maybe their efficacy has been inneffective all along....
Shoosh...dont tell anyone....

Spot quotes are meaningless.

And so are you...

Sprintcyclist wrote:Spot quotes are meaningless.

So is blind faith in faulty concepts.

No, no blind faith.
These are spot quotes.
They are meaningless

.......... In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. .......

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext

The data is quite good. Good find, thanks. Will check the references he gives.
There is no mention of ages of the patients, preexisting conditions or the outcomes.

Interesting reading, thanks

.......... Although current vaccines remain effective at preventing severe disease and deaths from COVID-19, our findings suggest that vaccination alone is not sufficient to prevent all transmission of the delta variant in the household setting, where exposure is close and prolonged. Increasing population immunity via booster programmes and vaccination of teenagers will help to increase the currently limited effect of vaccination on transmission, but our analysis suggests that direct protection of individuals at risk of severe outcomes, via vaccination and non-pharmacological interventions, will remain central to containing the burden of disease caused by the delta variant. ...............

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext

This research is on the family environment. Where most cross infections will occur.
As one of the medicos said here some time ago 'Everyone will get covid.'

This is good information, thanks very much.

It'ld be good to see the outcomes of these cases.
statistically vaccinated people are hugely under represented in hospitals.