Scientists/doctors at Lancet and Nature have blood on their hands.

https://basedunderground.com/2021/07/08/scientists-and-doctors-at-the-lancet-and-nature-have-blood-on-their-evil-hands/


STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The Lancet and Nature have both promoted the natural origin theory for SARS-CoV-2, and protected the theory by refusing to publish counter arguments and/or publishing scientific statements by individuals with serious conflicts of interest


The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission included Peter Daszak, Ph.D., president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit organization that collaborated with various universities and organizations on research in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). He was recently taken off the Commission due to controversy over his large number of conflicts of interest


The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission also includes Danielle Anderson, an Australian WIV virologist who left Wuhan shortly before the pandemic broke out. Anderson says she “does not believe” the virus is manmade. Anderson’s Commission biography does not mention that she worked at the WIV


In January 2021, 14 global experts submitted a letter to The Lancet in which they argued that “the natural origin is not supported by conclusive arguments and that a lab origin cannot be formally discarded.” The submission was rejected with the justification that the topic was “not a priority” for the journal


Richard Horton, the editor-in-chief of The Lancet is now being criticized for his long defense and support of the Chinese regime, and is accused of using The Lancet to pursue political causes and stifle scientific debate


More than a year ago, in February 2020, a group of 27 scientists wrote a letter published in The Lancet condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”1



Although The Lancet — like other medical journals — requires contributors to disclose financial or personal interests that might be viewed as possible conflicts of interests with their submissions, the 27 authors declared they had “no competing interests.”


June 21, 2021, The Lancet published an addendum admitting that “some readers have questioned the validity of this disclosure, particularly as it relates to one of the authors, Peter Daszak.”2

Three docs at lancet remove their names from the lancet statement denouncing the lab leak theory.

https://amgreatness.com/2021/07/08/three-scientists-remove-their-names-from-lancet-statement-denouncing-lab-leak-theory/

Well, it could be that their analysis grew more sophisticated or precise (or something).

If this is, in fact, an "evolutionary (LOL) lineage" of coronavirus and a forerunner or "early model" covid19 that is still being refined, then there must be something specifically about it that strongly appeals to them for advancing a corona bioweapon. As a bioweapon, it so far seems failed, maybe because it launched prematurely (due to Chinese carelessness, which is something that will no doubt continue in the future)?

The cloak of secrecy has been unveiled, and the cat's out of the bag now, eh?