Common food dye makes skin and muscle temporarily transparent

Seems to be some kind of red dye but they don't mention which one. Red Dye 40??? I don't know. I do know that Red Dye 40 seems not to be a good thing to consume and if you check candies especially or anything red, there it is. and now they're saying it makes skin/muscle temporarily transparent and the benefit of this is that it highlights injury? or disease? I have a feeling we're not getting the WHOLE story.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/sep/05/common-food-dye-found-to-make-skin-and-muscle-temporarily-transparent

I've noticed that we see reports of these alleged 'medical breakthrough' yet we never see them in procedures for detecting or treating health issues in our own lives.

I've had a nurse tell me that taking blood from the hand is different quality of blood than taking it from the arm. And another says...'i never heard that'.

Calypso Jones wrote: Seems to be some kind of red dye but they don't mention which one. Red Dye 40???  I don't know.  I  do know that Red Dye 40 seems not to be a good thing to consume and if you check candies especially or anything red, there it is.  and now they're saying it makes skin/muscle temporarily transparent and the benefit of this is that it highlights injury? or disease?   I have a feeling we're not getting the WHOLE story.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/sep/05/common-food-dye-found-to-make-skin-and-muscle-temporarily-transparent

I've noticed that we see reports of these alleged 'medical breakthrough' yet we never see them in procedures for detecting or treating health issues in our own lives.

I've had a nurse tell me that taking blood from the hand is different quality of blood than taking it from the arm. And another says...'i never heard that'.  

Yeah, I truly wonder what THEY'RE defining as "temporary" and yes, I would question heavily whether we're getting the whole story. There seems to be a mentality in the medical community that the patient is only told what they want to hear rather than the truth.

Tucker Carlson was just commenting, a few weeks ago.

Twenty years ago, so many people smoked. Cigarettes. Now, the Smoke Nazis have succeeded, and smoking is almost completely stamped out.

Are people healthier, now? NO. They're fatter, looking ill, and having less children. Men are showing lowered testosterone levels. Nicotine, they are now saying, encourages the production of testosterone. And much of the processed food we've been taught to eat, is heavily laced with soy and seed oils.

Casey Jones wrote:Tucker Carlson was just commenting, a few weeks ago.

Twenty years ago, so many people smoked.  Cigarettes.  Now, the Smoke Nazis have succeeded, and smoking is almost completely stamped out.

Are people healthier, now?  NO.  They're fatter, looking ill, and having less children.  Men are showing lowered testosterone levels.  Nicotine, they are now saying, encourages the production of testosterone.  And much of the processed food we've been taught to eat, is heavily laced with soy and seed oils.

Being lactose intolerant, I stopped drinking soy milk several years ago because I found out that soy contains lots of Estrogen.

This is some serious incompetence on the part of the gov't...what are they doing in this 'business' anyway.

makes you wonder....is it incompetence? or is it intent.

Calypso Jones wrote:This is some serious incompetence on the part of the gov't...what are they doing in this 'business' anyway.

makes you wonder....is it incompetence?  or is it intent.

Of course the goobermint will always SAY it's incompetence. The Cocaine in the WH, Epstein's "suicide", the attempted assassination of President Trump, etc., etc, etc. It's called "plausible deniability" and the goobermint is VERY competent in that.

Calypso Jones wrote:This is some serious incompetence on the part of the gov't...what are they doing in this 'business' anyway.

makes you wonder....is it incompetence?  or is it intent.

Either one, should be a no-schitt conclusive argument for GETTING GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR DIET.

Out of our LIVES.

Unfortunately, control-freaks are drawn to government. Incompetent control-freaks most of all.

And a rich society, which we were, has the resources to ALLOW these fa-cops to get in and do their damage.

AND...our FIAT MONEY - off a printing press, with nothing backing it - allows UNLIMITED EXPANSION OF THIS GOVERNMENT.

We're not going to get government to agree to what the Constitution ALREADY stipulates - "No State shall make any Thing but Gold and Silver Coin, a tender in Payment of Debt." Now the job is to enforce it - with HANGINGS of those within who have violated it.

Hangings for Treason.

Collapse, and mass-executions, will put us back on sound money, and end this Financialized adventurism of the Deep State.