Is it too late to save Germany?

hurricanehook wrote:

Calypso Jones wrote:https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/too-little-too-late-german-government-talks-tough-on-immigration/

what do you think?

The German left-liberal government is trying to get tougher on immigration after the knife attack in Solingen that left three innocent people dead and a country shocked and angered about the rise of crime among migrants. The steps may prove to be too little, too late, as anti-immigration parties look to dominate the upcoming regional elections in three eastern states.


my opinion is...iif this bunch the left/libs stay in power, they're not going to do anything..it will continue.. and even if another party is elected and they're serious about deportation..it is going to be long and hard with lib/lefties standing in the way every step of the way.

Banning knives  and putting limits on types and lengths of knives is stupid and failing to address the real problem...THE SO CALLED MIGRANTs.      I have a solution but i dare not post it.

Your question should be "is it too late for the United States? "

I have wondered the exact same thing myself! The Democrats have ignored the law so much and the Conservatives have done nothing, that I wonder if the United States is too far gone toward Socialism/Communism for it to ever get back.

Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

You may be absolutely correct Keith.

hurricanehook wrote:

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

You may be absolutely correct Keith.

While I do not think that voting is the entire answer, I do not think that it's worthless. We got into the shape we're in because we put the Communists in by voting for them!

RV wrote:

hurricanehook wrote:

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

You may be absolutely correct Keith.

While I do not think that voting is the entire answer, I do not think that it's worthless. We got into the shape we're in because we put the Communists in by voting for them!

It's more like we got this way because we kept voting for the "lesser of two evils", even if that person was a "Republican".

It's interesting how for the three years before an election, people on the right badmouth the whole process, and say the two-party system is a joke and that all candidates are bought and controlled, but when it comes voting time, they expediently forget all of that and vote for the "lesser of two evils", because "anyone is better than a Democrat" or some other lame excuse.

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

hurricanehook wrote:

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

You may be absolutely correct Keith.

While I do not think that voting is the entire answer, I do not think that it's worthless. We got into the shape we're in because we put the Communists in by voting for them!

It's more like we got this way because we kept voting for the "lesser of two evils", even if that person was a "Republican".

It's interesting how for the three years before an election, people on the right badmouth the whole process, and say the two-party system is a joke and that all candidates are bought and controlled, but when it comes voting time, they expediently forget all of that and vote for the "lesser of two evils", because "anyone is better than a Democrat" or some other lame excuse.

I would guess that you and I define "the lesser of two evils" quite differently! The "lesser of two evils" is according to YOU, not voting at all.

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

Martin Armstrong, an old-time Sound Money economist, predicts that the US will break up into three regions after the backlash coming from the fraudulent election...and the Rent-A-Mobs that the Dumbos will deploy, aided by 40 million illegals.

Armstrong got into future prognosticating in an odd way...he'd come to the understanding that predicting economic trends depended on political trends. The Internet traffic - trigger words, level of discussion - offers a lot of clues that statistically, can be sorted out somewhat.

He has an algorithm, Socrates, he calls it, that scrapes the web and puts odds on any given outcome in question. He believes that a rejection by the public, of the outcome of this election, is near-certain. EITHER the vast majority reject it (theft) or the Power Elites, the government class and the educrat class. They are few in numbers but have unlimited resources, and can manipulate pawns.

The breakup of the Untied Skates is not a tragedy - it's a salvation, for those who want to put borders and distance between them and Washington's tyranny and confiscatory taxes.

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

hurricanehook wrote:

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

You may be absolutely correct Keith.

While I do not think that voting is the entire answer, I do not think that it's worthless. We got into the shape we're in because we put the Communists in by voting for them!

It's more like we got this way because we kept voting for the "lesser of two evils", even if that person was a "Republican".

It's interesting how for the three years before an election, people on the right badmouth the whole process, and say the two-party system is a joke and that all candidates are bought and controlled, but when it comes voting time, they expediently forget all of that and vote for the "lesser of two evils", because "anyone is better than a Democrat" or some other lame excuse.

Let me translate your comment, you have voted for the Communists justifying it to yourself by thinking that they are the "lesser of two evils". You may try to pass yourself off as a Conservative but, your comments show that you are indeed a Democrat/liberal.

RV wrote:

Keith wrote:

RV wrote:

hurricanehook wrote:

Keith wrote:Trying to save any country through voting doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days. You'd have an easier time throwing a rope at the sky and lassoing the moon.

You may be absolutely correct Keith.

While I do not think that voting is the entire answer, I do not think that it's worthless. We got into the shape we're in because we put the Communists in by voting for them!

It's more like we got this way because we kept voting for the "lesser of two evils", even if that person was a "Republican".

It's interesting how for the three years before an election, people on the right badmouth the whole process, and say the two-party system is a joke and that all candidates are bought and controlled, but when it comes voting time, they expediently forget all of that and vote for the "lesser of two evils", because "anyone is better than a Democrat" or some other lame excuse.

Let me translate your comment, you have voted for the Communists justifying it to yourself by thinking that they are the "lesser of two evils". You may try to pass yourself off as a Conservative but, your comments show that you are indeed a Democrat/liberal.

Actually, I don't consider myself either one, but I guess you're going to believe what you want to believe.

Keith, no offense but perhaps you don't know enough about either so that is why you make no distinction for your own beliefs. ME..i WAS a liberal so i know what they do. I won't go back to that.