Simulation Hypothesis...this is more sci-fi than philosophy
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Simulation Hypothesis...this is more sci-fi than philosophy
Been watching this theory/hypothesis on TV for past two days and it troubled me at first becasue...1. I don't want to live in a Matrix like simulation of life/reality. and 2...it ignores God but hints at, whether wittingly or not, an intelligent designer.
https://www.gotquestions.org/simulation-theory.html
and really...it is only man's sci fi ideas to replace a Creator God.
Occasionally, a philosopher or scientist will suggest our reality is not “real.” While this is a common theme in science fiction and fantasy, some propose it might be true in the actual world. Their claim—or at least, their question—suggests that all of reality is actually a simulation, that what we think of as “real” is something artificial and only part of a larger existence. The suggestion comes in many different forms, united through basic components, loosely described as simulation theory. All such claims are heavily flavored by solipsism, which suggests our observations are untrustworthy. Any simulation hypothesis or simulation theory has to contend with the weaknesses inherent in solipsism itself.
As it turns out, Scripture indicates that our earthly lives are only part of a larger whole, and there is a “real reality” above and beyond what we experience on a day-to-day basis. The Bible says our “reality” is created and designed. And yet, most who support “simulation theory” reject the idea of God, an afterlife, or other spiritual concepts. This is not dissimilar to how many atheists attempt to use evidence for the Big Bang Theory against biblical views, despite the fact that concepts like a “beginning” were once seen as antithetical to atheism itself.
MORE at link.
https://www.gotquestions.org/simulation-theory.html
and really...it is only man's sci fi ideas to replace a Creator God.
Occasionally, a philosopher or scientist will suggest our reality is not “real.” While this is a common theme in science fiction and fantasy, some propose it might be true in the actual world. Their claim—or at least, their question—suggests that all of reality is actually a simulation, that what we think of as “real” is something artificial and only part of a larger existence. The suggestion comes in many different forms, united through basic components, loosely described as simulation theory. All such claims are heavily flavored by solipsism, which suggests our observations are untrustworthy. Any simulation hypothesis or simulation theory has to contend with the weaknesses inherent in solipsism itself.
As it turns out, Scripture indicates that our earthly lives are only part of a larger whole, and there is a “real reality” above and beyond what we experience on a day-to-day basis. The Bible says our “reality” is created and designed. And yet, most who support “simulation theory” reject the idea of God, an afterlife, or other spiritual concepts. This is not dissimilar to how many atheists attempt to use evidence for the Big Bang Theory against biblical views, despite the fact that concepts like a “beginning” were once seen as antithetical to atheism itself.
MORE at link.
Calypso Jones- Posts : 28973
Points : 39069
Reputation : 576
Join date : 2021-02-08
Age : 24
Re: Simulation Hypothesis...this is more sci-fi than philosophy
Calypso Jones wrote:Been watching this theory/hypothesis on TV for past two days and it troubled me at first becasue...1. I don't want to live in a Matrix like simulation of life/reality. and 2...it ignores God but hints at, whether wittingly or not, an intelligent designer.
https://www.gotquestions.org/simulation-theory.html
and really...it is only man's sci fi ideas to replace a Creator God.
Occasionally, a philosopher or scientist will suggest our reality is not “real.” While this is a common theme in science fiction and fantasy, some propose it might be true in the actual world. Their claim—or at least, their question—suggests that all of reality is actually a simulation, that what we think of as “real” is something artificial and only part of a larger existence. The suggestion comes in many different forms, united through basic components, loosely described as simulation theory. All such claims are heavily flavored by solipsism, which suggests our observations are untrustworthy. Any simulation hypothesis or simulation theory has to contend with the weaknesses inherent in solipsism itself.
As it turns out, Scripture indicates that our earthly lives are only part of a larger whole, and there is a “real reality” above and beyond what we experience on a day-to-day basis. The Bible says our “reality” is created and designed. And yet, most who support “simulation theory” reject the idea of God, an afterlife, or other spiritual concepts. This is not dissimilar to how many atheists attempt to use evidence for the Big Bang Theory against biblical views, despite the fact that concepts like a “beginning” were once seen as antithetical to atheism itself.
MORE at link.
Dems have been living in and voting for theory for many years now.
Calypso Jones and RV like this post
Similar topics
» Yellowstone Super Volcano Simulation
» Mark Levin: Bastiat philosophy as it applies to us today
» Bible study teaches the "documentary hypothesis" that cobbles together Biblical parts and attributes them to Moses.
» Mark Levin: Bastiat philosophy as it applies to us today
» Bible study teaches the "documentary hypothesis" that cobbles together Biblical parts and attributes them to Moses.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum