Respect for Authorities, 'DIED SUDDENLY'

https://discernreport.com/respect-for-authorities-died-suddenly/

“Died suddenly” might just become the catchall epithet (or maybe epitaph) for our age.  Right now the medical community continues to destroy what’s left of its reputation by refusing to connect the dots between increased rates of cancer and heart disease and the global rollout of the mostly mandated pharmaceutical injections not only falsely touted as cures to COVID, but also falsely labeled as “vaccines.”  Every time a fourteen-year-old athlete “dies suddenly” on the gridiron or basketball court, the ethically compromised killers in white coats throw out all kinds of ludicrous explanations for why healthy young people are losing their lives.  It was stress!  It was red meat!  It was racism!  Or the increasingly ubiquitous it must have been climate change!

It’s funny, if not disturbing, to see all the people who changed their first name to “Doctor” struggle to reach the most obvious conclusion: that an experimental mRNA serum rushed to market without necessary testing or proper scrutiny might be to blame.  Elementary school children with a rudimentary understanding of the Scientific Method and medical ethics would understand the potential harm from requiring healthy patients unlikely to die from COVID to nonetheless be “treated” with untested “vaccines.”  Yet the “first, do no harm” swarm of group-thinkers, who have trouble realizing when pharmaceutical companies are using humans as guinea pigs to make billions in profits, jumped-to and insisted that the whole global population must be injected with possible poisons.

Why would you experiment on anybody unless it was absolutely necessary (and then done only with informed consent)?  Why would you recklessly expand that experiment to the whole human race?  Only the “scientific experts” could trip over such basic precepts of medical ethics on their way to creating a potential global catastrophe.

You would think that the same medical community that unwittingly conspired with evil pharmaceutical companies to hook millions of Americans on OxyContin and other opioids would have been more skeptical when magical COVID elixirs were quickly developed and marketed as cure-alls.  Alas, the gullible are getting only more gullible.  Perhaps this is why “climate change” is still the globalist boogeyman that haunts so many pliant imaginations around the world.  The unscrupulous authorities who lied about the efficacy of lockdowns, masks, and experimental “vaccines” would never lie about “climate change,” right?


What kind of monsters would tell the world that carbon is killing the planet if the science isn’t sound?  Maybe the same globalist monsters who used COVID as a propaganda vehicle for establishing a “Great Reset” are also interested in using “climate change” hysteria to convince people that they must surrender their private property, privacy, and human rights in order to survive.

In the “died suddenly” era, authorities don’t seek truth; they seek politically convenient “narratives” that protect the entrenched power of the status quo.  

Case in point: the “trans” movement.  Nowhere in human history has any society struggled with the biological distinctions separating men from women.  Only in our absurd present age have the most credentialed twisted their neurons into such knots that they know less than those who never had a written language.  

(People who know this is all wrong are labelled crazy and/or intolerant while the nuts are cutting off body parts of children and confused men and women)

At some point, a critical mass of people will reject a governing system overrun by misanthropes, lunatics, sadists, and liars.  Populations do not obey those undeserving of respect.  When respect for authorities “dies suddenly,” old orders will not survive.

conspiracy far right religious cult site

I agree with everything CJ said, I don't believe that the "population will reject" ANYONE though. We have lunatics electing people like Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, Fedderman, etc.

Conspiracy theories are things the gov't doesn't want you to know.

RV wrote:I agree with everything CJ said, I don't believe that the "population will reject" ANYONE though. We have lunatics electing people like Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, Fedderman, etc.

I don't think so.

I think it's paid vote frauders who are electing these scum. We have seen, have we not, HOW DEEP this fraud goes? We've still only scratched the surface.

Yeah, yeah, conspiracy theories. We know that because the people performing the fraud, tell us that.

Casey Jones wrote:

RV wrote:I agree with everything CJ said, I don't believe that the "population will reject" ANYONE though. We have lunatics electing people like Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, Fedderman, etc.

I don't think so.

I think it's paid vote frauders who are electing these scum.  We have seen, have we not, HOW DEEP this fraud goes?  We've still only scratched the surface.

Yeah, yeah, conspiracy theories.  We know that because the people performing the fraud, tell us that.

It's curious that when a Democrat defrauds, it's ok but, when a Republican does it, it's a "CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY"...

[quote="RV"][quote="Casey Jones"]

RV wrote:I agree with everything CJ said, I don't believe that the "population will reject" ANYONE though. We have lunatics electing people like Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, Fedderman,

It's curious that when a Democrat defrauds, it's ok but, when a Republican does it, it's a "CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY"...

When did "CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY" become a bad thing? Democracy is nothing but a 4 syllable word for mob rule

JMWinPR wrote:

RV wrote:

Casey Jones wrote:

RV wrote:I agree with everything CJ said, I don't believe that the "population will reject" ANYONE though. We have lunatics electing people like Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, Fedderman,

It's curious that when a Democrat defrauds, it's ok but, when a Republican does it, it's a "CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY"...

When did "CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY" become a bad thing? Democracy is nothing but a 4 syllable word for mob rule

Apparently it is a only "bad thing" when that "crisis" is as a result of what the dems label as a "crisis".

You know when dems set everything on fire, destroy government buildings, destroy Police cars, prevent the injured from being taken to a hospital, wantonly murder the innocent, destroy monuments, loot businesses and declare mob rule over an area it is described as "peaceful" but, when it is actual peaceful conservatives or Christians protesting THEN, it's "bad", "chaotic", "a crisis", "immoral", "against Christ's teachings", etc., etc., etc.

RV wrote:

Casey Jones wrote:

RV wrote:I agree with everything CJ said, I don't believe that the "population will reject" ANYONE though. We have lunatics electing people like Feinstein, Schiff, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, Fedderman, etc.

I don't think so.

I think it's paid vote frauders who are electing these scum.  We have seen, have we not, HOW DEEP this fraud goes?  We've still only scratched the surface.

Yeah, yeah, conspiracy theories.  We know that because the people performing the fraud, tell us that.

It's curious that when a Democrat defrauds, it's ok but, when a Republican does it, it's a "CRISIS OF DEMOCRACY"...

maybe it is a crisis of democracy....mob rule...obviously democrats want mob rule as we can see daily ...unfortunately for them...this is a representative republic...which unfortunately for US, they've learned how to milk it for their own power and purse.

Calypso Jones wrote:maybe it is a crisis of democracy....mob rule...obviously democrats want mob rule as we can see daily ...unfortunately for them...this is a representative republic...which unfortunately for US, they've learned how to milk it for their own power and purse.

Yes this is a Representative Republic, however, our representatives don't always do what the majority of their constituents want them to do.